Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=70 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Ventilation Using a Bag Valve Mask With Integrated Internal Handle

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02792049 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
70
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2016
Primary outcomePrimary: Mean Received Tidal Volume — 681; 591 milliliters

Summary

Investigators compared tidal volumes for single rescuer ventilation using a modified bag valve mask with an integrated internal handle versus a conventional bag valve mask in a manikin model.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Received Tidal Volume
681; 591
SECONDARY
Modified Bag Valve Mask (BVM) Ease of Use
5; 5
SECONDARY
Modified Bag Valve Mask (BVM) Better Seal Formation
4; 4
SECONDARY
Modified Bag Valve Mask (BVM) Willingness to Use in Emergency Situation
5; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Who Preferred the Modified Bag Valve Mask (BVM)
28; 28

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Emergency Department healthy volunteers (physician assistants, residents, paramedics, nurses, medics, respiratory therapists.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not trained in basic life support
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02792049). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search