N/A N=70 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Ventilation Using a Bag Valve Mask With Integrated Internal Handle

Apnea

Bottom Line

View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02792049 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

0.0%

Results posted

Jul 2016

Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Received Tidal Volume — 681; 591 milliliters

Study Design & Population

Study type: Interventional
Phase: N/A
Interventions: Modified Ambu Spur II bag valve mask (Device); Conventional Ambu Spur II bag valve mask (Device)
Age: Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex: All
Sponsor: Brooke Army Medical Center
Primary completion: Oct 2015

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Mean Received Tidal Volume	681; 591	—
SECONDARY Modified Bag Valve Mask (BVM) Ease of Use	5; 5	—
SECONDARY Modified Bag Valve Mask (BVM) Better Seal Formation	4; 4	—
SECONDARY Modified Bag Valve Mask (BVM) Willingness to Use in Emergency Situation	5; 5	—
SECONDARY Number of Participants Who Preferred the Modified Bag Valve Mask (BVM)	28; 28	—

Summary

Investigators compared tidal volumes for single rescuer ventilation using a modified bag valve mask with an integrated internal handle versus a conventional bag valve mask in a manikin model.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Emergency Department healthy volunteers (physician assistants, residents, paramedics, nurses, medics, respiratory therapists.

Exclusion Criteria

Not trained in basic life support

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02792049). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.