N/A
N=70
Ventilation Using a Bag Valve Mask With Supplemental External Handle
Apnea
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02800213 ↗Enrolled (actual)
70
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Received Tidal Volume — 662; 681 milliliters — p=0.280
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Modified Ambu Spur II bag valve mask (Device); Conventional Ambu Spur II bag valve mask (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Brooke Army Medical Center
- Primary completion
- May 2016
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Received Tidal Volume |
662; 681 | 0.280 |
Summary
Investigators compared tidal volumes for single rescuer ventilation using a modified bag valve mask with a supplemental external handle versus a conventional bag valve mask in a manikin model.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Emergency Department healthy volunteers (physician assistants, residents, paramedics, nurses, medics, respiratory therapists).
Exclusion Criteria
- Not trained in basic life support
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02800213). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.