Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=92 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

The Effect of Oral PhenazopyrIdine on Perioperative Voiding After Mid-urethral sliNg (EPIPhANy Study)

Dysfunctional Voiding · Postoperative Pain
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02806713 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
92
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Percentage of Participants With a Failed Voiding Trial — 35; 32; 9; 12 Participants

Summary

Randomized clinical trial using phenazopyridine to decrease voiding dysfunction after a retropubic midurethral sling operation.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With a Failed Voiding Trial
35; 32; 9; 12
SECONDARY
Change in Participant-reported Pain From Pre to Post Procedure Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
1.76; 1.21

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Any female subjects scheduled to undergo Mid-Urethral Sling (MUS) through the UMass urogynecology service for incontinence.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Planned concurrent prolapse or other procedure besides cystoscopy
  • Using intermittent self catheterization preoperatively
  • Undergoing spinal anesthesia for the procedure
  • Known allergy to phenazopyridine (AKA Pyridium)
  • Renal insufficiency
  • Any condition or situation that in the attending physician's opinion would contra-indicate the use of phenazopyridine
  • Subjects not competent to give consent
  • Prisoners
  • Non-English speaking patients
  • Age <18
  • Pregnant patients
  • Contraindications to the use of IV methylene blue including
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity reactions
  • Severe renal insufficiency
  • Patients with G6PD deficiency
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02806713). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search