Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=12 Randomized Supportive Care

Determining the Potential Benefit of Powered Prostheses

Unilateral Traumatic Amputation · Amputation, Traumatic

Enrolled (actual)
12
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Metabolic Cost of Walking — 0.409; 0.397 J/Nm — p=0.585

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Powered ankle prosthesis (Device); Dynamic Response Foot (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 21+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Deanna H Gates
Primary completion
Aug 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Metabolic Cost of Walking
0.409; 0.397 0.585
PRIMARY
Total Steps Outside the Home Over a Two Week Period
2030; 1640 0.452
PRIMARY
Quality of Life (QoL) on a Short-Form 36
62.9; 59.4; 63.6; 67.4 0.480
SECONDARY
Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ)
75.2; 84.0; 85.6; 80.6; 66.8; 84.8 0.058
SECONDARY
Muscle Activity in the Lower Limb
24.3; 24.1; 25.3; 28.7; 29.9; 28.6 0.655
SECONDARY
Time to Fatigue
14.7; 13.2 0.212

Summary

The goal of this research is to determine the effectiveness of a powered prosthesis compared to an unpowered prosthesis during short bouts of walking, extended periods of walking (to fatigue), and performance in the community.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult (over 21 years old), Has unilateral transtibial amputation, has used prosthesis for at least 6 months, is currently using an unpowered prosthesis, can walk unassisted for at least 10 minutes

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of orthopedic or neurologic disorders to their intact limb, history of cardiovascular disease that prevents them from safely completing requested activities, unable to walk for 30 minutes at a time
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02828982). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search