Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=180

Morphological Pattern of the Atrophic Posterior Maxillae

Bone Deficiency, Posterior Maxillae

Enrolled (actual)
180
Serious AEs
Results posted
Sep 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Lateral Wall Thickness — 161 mm

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Cone-beam computed topography (Radiation)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Center of Implantology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Badajoz, Spain
Primary completion
Sep 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Lateral Wall Thickness
161

Summary

Overcoming the vertical and horizontal bone deficiency in the posterior maxillae are considered as the most challenging scenarios for implant-supported oral rehabilitation in modern implant dentistry. Therefore, a comprehensive and precise understanding of such anatomical structures are needed to avoid potential complications that ultimately might jeopardize the treatment outcome. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) offers some advantages to conventional CT-scan such as lower-dose radiation with high isotropic spatial resolution and cost. Therefore, it offers a viable and reliable tool to study anatomical structures such as the posterior atrophic maxillae

Eligibility Criteria

  • Images were included if:
  • Pristine maxillary posterior atrophic ridges (between premolars and molars) as a result of missing single or multiple teeth for over than 12 months.
  • Residual ridge height (RH) was < 10 mm.
  • Presence of teeth adjacent to or opposing the edentulous area so the location of the edentulous ridges corresponding to the tooth site could be identified.
  • The maxillary sinus to be measured was visible from its floor to at least 15 mm from the alveolar crest of the edentulous ridge.
  • Images were excluded if:
  • Images were unclear or incomplete due to scattering or other reasons
  • Edentulous ridge height was more than 10 mm
  • Ridge preservation/augmentation simultaneous/delayed to tooth extractions
  • Grafted maxillary sinus for implant-supported prosthesis
  • The location of the edentulous ridge cannot be determined
  • Implants or other prosthetic device restoring the posterior ridge
  • Presence of sinus pathology that made the measurement impossible
  • The outline of the edentulous ridge cannot be identified due to low 'grey scale' density
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02833337). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search