N/A N=180 Morphological Pattern of the Atrophic Posterior Maxillae
Bone Deficiency, Posterior Maxillae
Primary: Lateral Wall Thickness — 161 mm
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
Phase 2 N=22 Bone Material Comparison in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
Alveolar Bone Resorption · Sequela · Tooth Extrusion
Primary: Bone Density - Limited View CBCT (Cone-beam Computed Tomography) Measurements — 14.4; 1.5 percentage of bone height shrinkage
N/A N=10 A Feasibility Study for Growth Bone Vertically With Titanium Mesh and Allograft in Lower Posterior Jaw
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: Bone Height — 12.2 millimeters
Phase 2 N=18 Cell Therapy for Craniofacial Bone Defects
Cleft Palate · Trauma
Primary: Bone Regeneration — 1.5; 3.3 implant sites
N/A N=16 Clinical and Histological Evaluation of Deproteinizated Bovine Bone Allograft and Lyophilized Equine Bone Allograft for Sinus Lift.
Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation
Primary: Histomorphometric Evaluation of New Bone Formation. — 22.20; 22.84; 50.77; 46.20 percentage of millimeters
N/A N=41 An Assessment of Bone Augmentation in Post-Extraction Sockets
Unrestorable Dentition · Post-Extraction Sockets
Primary: Bone-fill in Grafted Post-extraction Sockets Versus Bone-fill in Non-grafted Post-extraction Sockets — 0.43; 0.27; 0.36; 0.28 mm
N/A N=6 Temporary Anchorage Devices for Ridge Preservation
Ridge Preservation
Primary: Changes in Width of Extraction Site (Ridge) — 0.7; 1.3 mm — p=<0.05
N/A N=9 Bioactive Glass (Sol-gel) for Alveolar Bone Regeneration After Surgical Extraction
Bone Loss · Vertical Alveolar Bone Loss · Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: Change in Alveolar Crestal Bone Height — 0.32; 0.84; 1.59; 0.96 mm
N/A N=5 Use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Alveolar Bone Tissue Engineering for Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
Cleft Lip and Palate
Primary: Amount of New Bone Mass Formed — 89 percentage of bone formation
N/A N=15 The Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Using Equine Xenograft and a Collagenated Porcine Cortical Lamina
Horizontal Ridge Deficiency
Primary: Change From Baseline in Radiological Bone Width Augmentation at 0 mm — 2.274 mm
N/A N=46 Effect of Healing Time on New Bone Formation Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
Bone Augmentation
Primary: Percent New Vital Bone Formation — 32.63; 47.41 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=24 Ridge Preservation Comparing an Intrasocket Graft Alone to an Intrasocket Graft Plus a Facial Overlay Graft
Clinical Efficacy
Primary: Horizontal Ridge Dimension — -1.6; -0.3 mm
N/A N=40 Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Cortical Versus Cancellous Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction
Primary: Histologic Percentage of Vital Bone Formation — 12.98; 16.08 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=9 A Histomorphometric Analysis Following Sinus Augmentation Using Two Different Bone Graft Materials.
Missing Teeth
Primary: Percentage of New Vital Bone. — 16.33; 26.11; 30.5; 39.67 percentage of new vital bone
Phase 4 N=41 EMD and/or Bone Substitute for the Treatment of Class II Furcations
Periodontal Disease
Primary: Relative Horizontal Clinical Attachment Level (RHCAL) at 12 Months — 2.31; 3.00; 2.57 mm
N/A N=37 The Influence of Bone Allograft Particle Sizes on the Quantity and Quality of New Bone Formation in Grafted Extraction Sockets and Edentulous Ridges
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation · Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Primary: New Bone Formation (in %) With the Use of Small vs. Large Particle Bone Allografts — 17.3; 25.9; 41.0; 31.4 % of new bone
N/A N=14 Comparison of Synthetic Bone Substitute and a Bovine-derived Xenograft in Horizontal Bone Augmentation
Jaw, Edentulous · Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Primary: Change of Vertical Height of Buccal Defects — -4.5; -4.82 mm
N/A N=27 A Prospective Study: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Tenting Screws, Acellular Dermal Matrix and Combination Particulate Grafts
Dental Alveolus · Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic
Primary: Gain in Horizontal Ridge Dimension — 3.33; 3.09 gain in ridge width (mm)
N/A N=43 Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Two Mineralized Cancellous Bone Allografts
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 27.19; 24.08 percentage
N/A N=22 Bone Augmentation Techniques in Extraction Sockets
Tooth Loss
Primary: Changes in Hard Tissue Composition — 35.82; 31.76 mm
Phase 4 N=17 Treatment of Post-Extraction Dehisced Socket - A Case Series Study
Tooth Loss
Primary: Bone Volumetric Reduction From Baseline to 20 Weeks Post-extraction — 73.26 mm3
N/A N=40 Evaluation of Healing at Molar Extraction Sites With and Without Ridge Preservation
Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction
Primary: Radiographic Bone Changes — -1.12; -2.60; -1.16; -.158 millimeter
Phase 2 N=26 Bone Tissue Engineering Using Autologous Bone Repair Cell (BRC) Therapy for Sinus Floor Bone Augmentation
Tooth Loss
Primary: Bone Mineral Density of Bone Core — .79; .78 mg/mm^3
N/A N=66 Histological Evaluation of Healing Following Ridge Preservation Using a Combined Cortical/Cancellous Mineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 26.4; 24.5; 28.8 percentage of total area
N/A N=12 Implant-fixed Restorations With ANKYLOS 6.6 mm Implants in the Edentulous Maxilla - A 5-year Follow-up Study
Edentulous Maxilla
Primary: Implant Survival Rate — 41; 19 Implants
N/A N=102 Wound Healing Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation Using DFDBA Alone in Particulate Fiber Form and in Combination With Xenograft
Dental Extraction · Wound Heal
Primary: Percentage Vital Bone Formation — 37.33; 40.76; 24.46; 23.85 percentage of vital bone formation
N/A N=21 Comparison of Post Tooth Extraction Healing Using Different Xenograft Materials
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: Percent New Bone Formation — 41; 25; 26 percentage of new bone formation
Phase 2 N=24 Treatment of Alveolar Bone Defects Using Aastrom Biosciences Autologous Tissue Repair Cell Therapy
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: Bone Regeneration — 79; 63 % bone height
N/A N=65 Study to Evaluate an Implant With a Sloped Top in Patients With a Sloped Jaw Bone
Edentulism
Primary: Bone Level Changes at the Lingual Aspect From Implant Placement (Baseline) to Re-entry 16 Weeks After Implant Placement — -0.02 mm
N/A N=86 Bone Regenerative Techniques in Endodontic Microsurgery
Apical Periodontitis
Primary: 2D Radiographic Healing at 12 Months Follow up (Overall Cases) — 24; 29; 1; 1 osteotomy site