Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=81 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Intravenous Versus Oral Acetaminophen in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Osteoarthritis · Acetaminophen · Arthroplasty, Hip Replacement

Enrolled (actual)
81
Serious AEs
1.7%
Results posted
Jan 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: 24 Hour Opioid Consumption — 3.0; 3.4 morphine milliequivalent

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Intravenous acetaminophen (Drug); Oral acetaminophen (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 56+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Duke University
Primary completion
Oct 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
24 Hour Opioid Consumption
3.0; 3.4
SECONDARY
Opioid Consumption (Other)
6.2; 6.8
SECONDARY
Pain Score, as Measured by the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) (Preoperatively)
1.0; 2.0
SECONDARY
Pain Scores, as Measured by the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) (1 Hour After Arrival to PACU)
2.0; 2.0
SECONDARY
Pain Score, as Measured by the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) (8 Hours)
3.0; 5.5
SECONDARY
Pain Score, as Measured by the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) (24 Hours)
5.0; 4.0
SECONDARY
Pain Score, as Measured by the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) (36 Hours)
5.0; 4.5
SECONDARY
Pain Score, as Measured by the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) (48 Hours)
5.0; 5.0
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction at 24 Hours
9; 9
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction at 48 Hours (48 Hours)
9; 9
SECONDARY
Straight Leg Raise
16; 11
SECONDARY
Heel Slide Test
25; 16
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Able to Complete the Supine to Sit Test
10; 6
SECONDARY
Self-paced Walk Test
86; 63
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Opioid-related Adverse Events
15; 7
SECONDARY
Analgesic Consumption as Measured by Patient Diary
0; 0
SECONDARY
Worst Pain (Day 30)
1.0; 0
SECONDARY
Pain Score, as Measured by the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) (Preoperatively)
1.0; 2.0
SECONDARY
Pain Scores, as Measured by the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) (1 Hour After Arrival to PACU)
2.0; 2.0
SECONDARY
Pain Score, as Measured by the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) (8 Hours)
3.0; 5.5
SECONDARY
Pain Score, as Measured by the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) (24 Hours)
5.0; 4.0
SECONDARY
Pain Score, as Measured by the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) (36 Hours)
5.0; 4.5
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction at 48 Hours
9; 9
SECONDARY
Pain Score, as Measured by the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) (48 Hours)
5.0; 5.0

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if intravenous acetaminophen is superior to oral acetaminophen when used as part of a multimodal pathway for primary total hip arthroplasty.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients scheduled for elective, primary total hip replacement for osteoarthritis
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Classification I-III
  • Weight 50 kg or greater
  • Body mass index 18-40 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inability to consent to study
  • Inability to speak English
  • Pregnancy
  • Weight <50 kg
  • Revision hip replacement or emergency surgery
  • Contraindications to spinal anesthesia: coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis, local infection, allergy to local anesthetics
  • Allergies/intolerances/contraindications to any of the multimodal agents: acetaminophen, pregabalin, celecoxib, ketamine, or dexamethasone
  • Chronic pain from a separate source other than operative hip
  • Daily opioid equivalent use of 30 mg of morphine or greater at time of consent
  • History of heart failure
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Uncontrolled anxiety, schizophrenia or other psychiatric disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the study assessments
  • Chronic malnutrition, renal or liver impairment
  • Hypersensitivity to acetaminophen or any of its excipients
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02839876). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search