Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=1,878 Randomized Prevention

AMPLATZER™ Amulet™ LAA Occluder Trial

Stroke

Enrolled (actual)
1,878
Serious AEs
57.4%
Results posted
Jan 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Primary Safety Endpoint: Composite Endpoint Rate of Procedure-related Complications, or All-cause Death or Major Bleeding (Defined as Type 3 or Greater Based on the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Definition) (Non-inferiority Analysis) — 14.5; 14.7 Percentage of participants — p=0.0002

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder (Device); WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Primary completion
Dec 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Primary Safety Endpoint: Composite Endpoint Rate of Procedure-related Complications, or All-cause Death or Major Bleeding (Defined as Type 3 or Greater Based on the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Definition) (Non-inferiority Analysis)
14.5; 14.7 0.0002 sig
PRIMARY
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Composite Rate of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism (Non-inferiority Analysis)
2.8; 2.8 <0.0001 sig
PRIMARY
Mechanism of Action Primary Endpoint: Rate of Device Closure, by the Echocardiography Core Lab (Non-inferiority Analysis)
98.9; 96.8 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Composite Rate of All Stroke, Systemic Embolism, or Cardiovascular/Unexplained Death (Non-inferiority Analysis)
5.6; 7.7 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Rate of Major Bleeding (Superiority Analysis)
11.6; 12.3 0.3229
SECONDARY
Superiority Test of Primary Safety Endpoint: Composite Endpoint Rate of Procedure-related Complications, or All-cause Death or Major Bleeding (Defined as Type 3 or Greater Based on the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) Definition)
14.5; 14.7 0.4660
SECONDARY
Superiority Test of Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Composite Rate of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism
2.8; 2.8 0.5017
SECONDARY
Superiority Test of Primary Mechanism of Action Endpoint: Rate of Device Closure, by the Echocardiography Core Lab
98.9; 96.8 0.0025 sig

Summary

The Amulet™ device will be evaluated for safety and efficacy by demonstrating its performance is non-inferior to the commercially available WATCHMAN® left atrial appendage closure device in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Patients who are eligible for the trial will be randomized to receive either the Amulet device or the WATCHMAN device and will be followed for 5 years after device implant.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Documented paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and the patient has not been diagnosed with rheumatic mitral valvular heart disease
  • At high risk of stroke or systemic embolism defined as CHADS2 score ≥ 2 or a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 3
  • Has an appropriate rationale to seek an alternative to warfarin or other anticoagulation medication
  • Deemed by investigator to be suitable for short term warfarin therapy but deemed unable to take long term oral anticoagulation, following the conclusion of shared decision making (see inclusion criteria #6)
  • Deemed suitable for LAA closure by a multidisciplinary team of medical professionals (including an independent non-interventional physician) involved in the formal and shared decision- making process, and by use of an evidence-based decision tool on oral anticoagulation (final determination must be documented in the subject's medical record)
  • Able to comply with the required medication regimen post-device implant
  • Able to understand and willing to provide written informed consent to participate in the trial
  • Able and willing to return for required follow-up visits and examinations

Exclusion Criteria

  • Requires long-term oral anticoagulation therapy for a condition other than atrial fibrillation
  • Contraindicated for or allergic to aspirin, clopidogrel, or warfarin use
  • Indicated for chronic P2Y12 platelet therapy inhibitor
  • Is considered at high risk for general anesthesia, in the opinion of the investigator, and/or based on past adverse reaction(s) requiring medical intervention or which resulted in prolongation of hospital stay (criterion is only applicable where general anesthesia is planned for the study procedure).
  • Has undergone atrial septal defect (ASD) repair or has an ASD closure device present
  • Has undergone patent foramen ovale (PFO) repair or has a PFO closure device implanted
  • Implanted with a mechanical valve prosthesis
  • Has any of the customary contraindications for a percutaneous catheterization procedure (e.g. subject is too small to accommodate the transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE/TOE) probe or required catheters, or subject has active infection or bleeding disorder)
  • Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 90 days prior to randomization or implant procedure (as applicable)
  • Underwent any cardiac or non-cardiac intervention or surgery within 30 days prior to randomization, or intervention or surgery is planned within 60 days after implant procedure (e.g. cardioversion, ablation, cataract surgery, etc.)
  • Myocardial infarction (MI) within 90 days prior to randomization
  • New York Heart Association Class IV Congestive Heart Failure
  • Left ventricular ejection Fraction (LVEF) ≤30%
  • Symptomatic carotid artery disease (defined as >50% stenosis with symptoms of ipsilateral transient or visual TIA evidenced by amaurosis fugax, ipsilateral hemispheric TIAs or ipsilateral stroke); if subject has a history of carotid stent or endarterectomy the subject is eligible if there is 2mm
  • Significant mitral valve stenosis (i.e. mitral valve area 15mm or length ≥ 15mm; excursion defined as maximal protrusion of the atrial septal aneurysm [ASA] beyond the plane of the atrial septum) or large shunt (early, within 3 beats and/or substantial passage of bubbles i.e. ≥ 20)
  • Complex atheroma with mobile plaque of the descending aorta and/or aortic arch
  • Cardiac tumor
  • LAA anatomy cannot accommodate either a Boston Scientific LAA closure device or Amulet device, as per manufacturer's Instructions for Use (IFU). (i.e. the LAA anatomy and sizing must be appropriate for both devices in order to be enrolled in the trial. This is applicable to all roll-in and randomized subjects).
  • Placement of the device would interfere with any intracardiac or intravascular structure
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02879448). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search