Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=50 Randomized Treatment

Paracervical Block Versus No Paracervical Block During IUD Insertion

Analgesia · IUD Insertion

Enrolled (actual)
50
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) — 2.4; 2.1 units on a scale — p=0.59

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Lidocaine (Drug); No analgesia (Other); Intrauterine device (IUD) (Device)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Primary completion
Oct 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
2.4; 2.1 0.59
PRIMARY
Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale
2.6; 3.6 0.23
PRIMARY
Pain Score as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale
2.6; 3.6 0.23

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the pain level and level of discomfort with paracervical block versus no analgesia in women who present to the University of Texas (UT) Physicians Obstetrics and Gynecology Continuity Clinic, The UT Physicians Women's Center, and the UT Physicians Women's Center- Bellaire for IUD insertion.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Women of reproductive age who present for an IUD insertion procedure at the University of Texas Physicians Obstetrics and Gynecology Continuity Clinic, The UT Physicians Women's Center, and the UT Physicians Women's Center- Bellaire for IUD insertion.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Women with current pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)
  • Women who are not good candidates for an IUD
  • Patients who have a Lidocaine allergy
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02904915). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search