Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=299 Diagnostic

Gallium-68 PSMA-11 PET in Intermediate to High-risk Preprostatectomy Patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02919111 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
299
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Sensitivity of PSMA PET for the Detection of Regional Nodal Metastases Compared to Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy — .43 proportion of participants
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
341citations · ~68 / year
Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial.
JAMA oncology · 2021 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

The investigators are imaging patients with prostate cancer using a new PET imaging agent (Ga-68-PSMA-11) in order to evaluate it's ability to detection prostate cancer in patients with high risk disease prior to prostatectomy.

Linked Publications (2)

  • Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial.
    JAMA oncology · 2021 · 341 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Presurgical <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 Positron Emission Tomography for Biochemical Recurrence Risk Assessment: A Follow-up Analysis of a Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial.
    European urology · 2023 · 20 citations · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Sensitivity of PSMA PET for the Detection of Regional Nodal Metastases Compared to Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy
.43
PRIMARY
Specificity of of PSMA PET for the Detection of Regional Nodal Metastases Compared to Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy
.94
PRIMARY
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of of PSMA PET for the Detection of Regional Nodal Metastases Compared to Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy
.64
PRIMARY
Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of PSMA PET for the Detection of Regional Nodal Metastases Compared to Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy
.87
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Grade 3 Treatment-related Adverse Events
SECONDARY
Sensitivity of PSMA PET for the Detection of Extra-pelvic Nodal Metastases
SECONDARY
Specificity of PSMA PET for the Detection of Extra-pelvic Nodal Metastases
SECONDARY
Positive Predictive Value of PSMA PET for the Detection of Extra-pelvic Nodal Metastases
SECONDARY
Negative Predictive Value of PSMA PET for the Detection of Extra-pelvic Nodal Metastases
SECONDARY
Sensitivity of PSMA PET for the Detection of Visceral Metastases
SECONDARY
Specificity of PSMA PET for the Detection of Visceral Metastases
SECONDARY
Positive Predictive Value of PSMA PET Visceral Metastases
SECONDARY
Negative Predictive Value of PSMA PET for the Detection of Visceral Metastases
SECONDARY
Sensitivity of PSMA PET for the Detection of Osseous Metastases
SECONDARY
Specificity of PSMA PET for the Detection of Osseous Metastases
SECONDARY
Positive Predictive Value of PSMA PET for the Detection of Osseous Metastases
SECONDARY
Negative Predictive Value of PSMA PET for the Detection of Osseous Metastases

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Biopsy proven prostate adenocarcinoma.
  • Planned prostatectomy with lymph node dissection.
  • Intermediate to high-risk disease (as determined by elevated Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) [PSA>10], T-stage [T2b or greater], Gleason score [Gleason score > 6] or other risk factors).
  • Diagnostic CT or MRI as part of the PET study or performed within one month of PSMA PET.
  • Karnofsky performance status of greater than 50 (or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) /World Health Organization (WHO) equivalent).
  • Age > 18.
  • Ability to understand a written informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients not capable of getting PET study due to weight, claustrophobia, or inability to lay still for the duration of the exam.
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy prior to prostatectomy.
  • Including focal ablation techniques (HiFu).
  • Androgen deprivation therapy or other neoadjuvant treatments prior to PET imaging and surgery.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02919111) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search