Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=179 Randomized Quadruple-blind Supportive Care

Comparison of PIEB vs CEI for Labor Analgesia

Labor Pain

Enrolled (actual)
179
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Volume of Local Anesthetic Received Through Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Per Hour — 4.03; 4.52 milliliters per hour — p=0.17

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus (Other); Continuous Epidural Infusion (Other); Ropivacaine (Drug); Fentanyl (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Duke University
Primary completion
Nov 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Volume of Local Anesthetic Received Through Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Per Hour
4.03; 4.52 0.17
SECONDARY
Volume of Local Anesthetic Required Per Hour
11.49; 12.38 0.18
SECONDARY
Time to First Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Bolus
SECONDARY
Maximum Reported Labor Pain Score
3; 2 0.27
SECONDARY
Degree of Motor Blockade Measured as Lowest Recorded Modified Bromage Score
37; 26; 9; 20; 4; 3 0.28
SECONDARY
Total Number of Subjects Experiencing Each Mode of Delivery
41; 37; 5; 5; 15; 17 0.85
SECONDARY
Number of Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Attempts
0.75; 0.63 0.53
SECONDARY
Ratio of Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) Successful Attempts to Unsuccessful Attempts
0.17; 0.12 0.03 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects Experiencing Hypotension Requiring Vasopressor Treatment
8; 3 0.21
SECONDARY
Duration of Second Stage of Labor
44; 63
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects Who Were Satisfied With Procedure
35; 39; 9; 3 0.08

Summary

The aim of this prospective, doubled-blinded randomized study is to compare two modes of epidural analgesia delivery, programmed intermittent epidural boluses (PIEB) versus continuous epidural infusion (CEI) with patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) dosing, for providing labor epidural analgesia. The primary outcome will be the volume of local anesthetic received through PCEA. Secondary outcomes will measure time to first PCEA bolus, labor pain scores, degree of motor blockade, mode of delivery, PCEA attempts and ratio of successful to unsuccessful attempts, frequency of hypotension, duration of first and second stages of labor and level of patient satisfaction. The investigator plans to enroll 120 nulliparous participants at 2-5 com cervical dilation, with 60 patients to each arm. The subject will be assigned to receive either delivery of epidural medication ropivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl 2mcg/mL with PIEB + PCEA dosing method or CEI + PCEA. Continuous data will be analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test or t-test as appropriate. Categorical data will be analyzed using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class 2 and 3 women
  • Nulliparous
  • Age > 18 yrs
  • gestational age > 36 weeks
  • singleton pregnancies
  • vertex pregnancies
  • spontaneous labor or scheduled induction of labor
  • cervical dilatation 2-5 cm at time of epidural placement
  • Pain score > 5

Exclusion Criteria

  • BMI > 50 kg/m2
  • history of past or current intravenous drug or chronic opioid abuse
  • chronic analgesic use
  • allergy or contraindication to any study medications
  • any maternal or fetal condition requiring planned assisted stage 2 delivery
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02949271). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search