Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=211 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Misoprostol 400 µg Versus 200 µg for Cervical Ripening in 1st Trimester Miscarriage

Miscarriage in First Trimester

Enrolled (actual)
211
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants Who Required Cervix Dilation at Initiation of the Manual Vacuum Aspiration — 4; 16; 102; 89 Participants — p=0.025

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Misoprostol 400mcg Tab (Drug); Misoprostol 200mcg Tab (Drug)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Primary completion
Oct 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants Who Required Cervix Dilation at Initiation of the Manual Vacuum Aspiration
4; 16; 102; 89 0.025 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Presence of a Uterine Cervical Canal With ≥8 mm of Dilation
30; 50; 76; 55

Summary

Local current protocol for cervical ripening in 1st trimester miscarriage recommends 400 µg of misoprostol intravaginally 3 hours before uterine evacuation. This regime has been recommended by some international guidelines . So far, there are no recent studies comparing cervical dilatation between 400 µg of misoprostol and a reduced dose (e.g., 200 µg) for 6 hours. If cervical ripening is similar between these two regimens(i.e., 200µg regimen is not inferior to 400µg regimen), costs reductions and lower side effects may be issued without losing quality of cervix dilatation.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • All patients admitted at the Gynecological emergency Unit at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre scheduled for uterine evacuation with 14000]);
  • patients with twin pregnancy;
  • patients with Marfan syndrome;
  • patients allergic to misoprostol;
  • patients with coagulopathy;
  • patients with opening of cervical internal os (4 mm of dilatation at the time of consultation);
  • patients with previous surgery of the cervix (conization);
  • patients with concomitant use of IUDs.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02957305). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search