Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=166 Treatment

LATERA-OFFICE Study

Nasal Obstruction

Enrolled (actual)
166
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Efficacy: Percent of Treatment Responders — 136 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Nasal Implant (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Spirox, Inc.
Primary completion
Mar 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Efficacy: Percent of Treatment Responders
136
PRIMARY
Safety: Procedure- and/or Device-related Adverse Events
31
SECONDARY
Percent of Treatment Responders
147; 143; 124; 103; 93
SECONDARY
Change in Nasal Airway Obstruction From Baseline Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
-34.3; -35.5; -36.9; -37.9; -41.5; -41.7 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire
115
SECONDARY
Procedure and Device-related Adverse Events
3

Summary

Prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, single-arm controlled study to obtain outcomes data in participants with severe to extreme class NOSE scores who are undergoing placement of the Spirox Latera Implant with or without concurrent turbinate reduction procedures in an office setting.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The subject has Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score ≥55.
  • The subject has dynamic lateral nasal wall insufficiency as confirmed by positive modified Cottle maneuver.
  • The subject is ≥18 years of age.
  • The subject is willing and able to provide informed consent and comply with the study protocol.
  • The subject is seeking treatment for nasal airway obstruction due to nasal valve collapse (NVC) and is willing to undergo an in-office nasal implant procedure alone or with a turbinate reduction procedure.
  • The subject has appropriate nasal and facial anatomy to receive the Latera Implant.
  • The subject agrees to follow-up examinations through 12 months post operatively.
  • The subject has failed to benefit from appropriate maximal medical management [eg, nasal steroids (at least 4 weeks); antihistamines; oral decongestants; nasal strips, stents, or cones]. Failure of maximal medical management may be from lack of effectiveness or tolerability.

Exclusion Criteria

  • The subject is having a concurrent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) or sinuplasty.
  • The subject has had rhinoplasty within the past 12 months.
  • The subject is planning to have other concurrent rhinoplasty procedure.
  • The subject is planning to have other rhinoplasty procedures or will use external dilators within 12 months after the index procedure.
  • The subject has had septoplasty and/or inferior turbinate reduction within the past 6 months.
  • The subject has, in the view of the clinician, inappropriate fixation on their nasal airway.
  • The subject plans to have any surgical or nonsurgical treatment of their nasal valve, other than the index procedure, within 12 months of the study.
  • The subject has a permanent Implant or dilator in the nasal area.
  • The subject has concomitant inflammatory or infectious skin conditions or unhealed wounds in the treatment area.
  • The subject currently has active nasal vestibulitis.
  • The subject has a history of nasal vasculitis.
  • The subject is a chronic systemic steroid or recreational intranasal drug user.
  • The subject has had a cancerous or precancerous lesion and/or has had radiation exposure in the treatment area or chemotherapy.
  • The subject has polyps or pathology (ie, septal deviation) other than turbinate hypertrophy and/or lateral wall insufficiency that would contribute to airway obstruction.
  • The subject has a history of a significant bleeding disorder(s) that would prevent healing of the treatment area post procedure.
  • The subject has a known or suspected allergy to polylactide polymer (PLA) or other absorbable materials.
  • The subject has a significant systemic disease such as poorly controlled diabetes which, in the investigator's opinion, could predispose the subject to poor wound healing.
  • The subject is currently using nasal oxygen or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).
  • The subject is not a candidate for procedures conducted under local anesthesia and/or managed anesthesia care (MAC) or conscious sedation.
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential, known or suspected to be pregnant, or is lactating.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02964312). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search