Phase 4
N=80
Single Dose Tramadol Effect on Extubation Response and Quality of Emergence Post-supratentorial Intracranial Surgery
Brain Neoplasm
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02964416 ↗Enrolled (actual)
80
Serious AEs
1.3%
Results posted
Aug 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Haemodynamic Parameters at the Time of Emergence and Postextubation — 128.55; 132.34; 132.63; 134.29 mm Hg
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Interventions
- Injection Tramadol (Drug); placebo (Other)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Aga Khan University
- Primary completion
- Mar 2018
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Haemodynamic Parameters at the Time of Emergence and Postextubation |
75.92; 77.83; 77.30; 78.65; 83.97; 85.78 | — |
| PRIMARY Haemodynamic Parameters at the Time of Emergence and Postextubation |
75.92; 77.83; 77.30; 78.65; 83.97; 85.78 | — |
| PRIMARY Haemodynamic Parameters at the Time of Emergence and Postextubation |
75.92; 77.83; 77.30; 78.65; 83.97; 85.78 | — |
| SECONDARY Measure the Quality of Emergence From General Anaesthesia by Measuring the Frequency of Cough on Cough Scale. |
0; 0; 2; 2; 1; 1 | — |
| SECONDARY Measure the Quality of Emergence From General Anaesthesia by Measuring the Frequency of Laryngospasm and Bronchospasm. |
0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Measure the Quality of Emergence From General Anaesthesia by Measuring Sedation Score |
— | — |
| SECONDARY Effect of Tramadol on Quality of Emergence Measured by Extubation Response Through Monitoring PONV |
0; 0; 3; 3; 0; 1 | — |
| SECONDARY Effect of Tramadol on Quality of Emergence Measured by Extubation Response Through Monitoring Convulsions |
0; 0; 0; 0; 1; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Effect of Tramadol on Quality of Emergence Measured by Extubation Response Through Monitoring GCS |
0; 0; 1; 0; 38; 41 | — |
| SECONDARY Effect of Tramadol on Quality of Emergence Measured by Extubation Response Through Mointoring Requirement of Analgesia |
5; 3; 15; 23; 3; 4 | — |
| SECONDARY Measure the Quality of Emergence From General Anaesthesia by Measuring the Frequency of Episodes of Denaturation |
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0 | — |
Summary
Several modalities have been studied to prevent coughing during emergence, including extubation in a deep plane of anesthesia but have proved to be unreliable. So far, no reliable method is recommended as standard of care. The advantages of administering tramadol includes a long duration of action, rapid recovery, limited depression of respiratory function and no effect on platelet makes it a safe medication to use for neurosurgical patients after craniotomy. The primary objective of the study is to observe the effect of single dose of tramadol (1mg/kg) administered 45 minutes before extubation on hemodynamic response (measurement of B.P and H.R) during extubation.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients with craniotomy for supratentorial tumors under general anesthesia
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) 2 and stable ASA 3 patients
- Elective surgery
- Patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 15/15
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to tramadol.
- History of epilepsy or convulsions due to any reason.
- Chronic usage of analgesic drugs.
- Patients using monoamine oxidase inhibitors.
- Patients with clinical signs of raised ICP.
- Obesity (women with a body mass index >35 kg/m2 or men with a body mass index >42 kg/m2)
- Language barrier.
- Patients taking B-blockers or Ca channel blockers.
- Patients above 65 years of age ( Physiology difference)
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02964416). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.