Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=66 Randomized Treatment

Pain Perception With Tenaculum Placement

Pain

Enrolled (actual)
66
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Pain With Tenaculum Placement — 44; 32 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Cough method for placement of tenaculum (Other); Slow Tenaculum Placement of tenaculum (Other)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Duke University
Primary completion
Feb 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Pain With Tenaculum Placement
44; 32
SECONDARY
Overall Pain With Intrauterine Device Insertion
62; 54
SECONDARY
Provider Satisfaction With Tenaculum Placement
26; 27

Summary

Randomized controlled trial that compares methods of tenaculum placement during intrauterine device insertion and their effect on pain. The two methods being compared are slow tenaculum placement versus tenaculum placement at time of cough. Subjects will be asked to rate their pain using visual analog scale. Primary outcome measured is pain at time of tenaculum placement. Secondary outcomes are overall pain with intrauterine device insertion and provider satisfaction with tenaculum placement.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Women ages 18 years and older
  • Undergoing intrauterine device placement
  • English or Spanish speaking

Exclusion Criteria

  • Primary language other than English or Spanish
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02969421). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search