N/A
N=43
VL vs DL in Inexperienced Users: a Pediatric Manikin Study
Videolaryngoscopes (VL) · Direct Laryngoscopy (DL) · Inexperienced Users
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02991820 ↗Enrolled (actual)
43
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Jul 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Time to Endotracheal Intubation — 72; 30; 72; 27 seconds
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Miller (Device); Macintosh (Device); C-MAC (Device); GlideScope (Device)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Joseph D. Tobias
- Primary completion
- May 2017
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Time to Endotracheal Intubation |
72; 30; 72; 27; 61; 20 | — |
| SECONDARY Successful Intubation Within 120 Seconds |
7; 30; 7; 31; 11; 31 | — |
Summary
This study will compare the CMAC and Glidescope videolaryngoscopes (VL) to traditional direct laryngoscopy (DL) using either a Miller or Macintosh laryngoscope by studying the performance of users. This will involve the use of an intubating pediatric manikin to assess various aspects of endotracheal intubation by experienced and inexperienced users.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Faculty pediatric anesthesiologists
- CRNAs
- Trainees (SRNAs, residents, fellows, and medical students)
- Nurses from NCH
Exclusion Criteria
- If subjects are unwilling to participate.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02991820). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.