N/A N=566 The Videolaryngoscopy in Small Infants
Surgery · Anesthesia, Endotracheal
Primary: Number of Participants With Success in the First Attempt — 253; 243 Participants
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=225 King Vision® and GlideScope® in Difficult Airways
Airway Management
Primary: Overall Successful Tracheal Intubation for All 3 Video Laryngoscopes - GSAVL, KVChVL and KVNChVL — 72; 61; 72 Participants
N/A N=117 Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope
Respiratory Failure
Primary: First Pass Success Rate — 24; 42 percentage of first pass success
N/A N=43 VL vs DL in Inexperienced Users: a Pediatric Manikin Study
Videolaryngoscopes (VL) · Direct Laryngoscopy (DL) · Inexperienced Users
Primary: Time to Endotracheal Intubation — 72; 30; 72; 27 seconds
N/A N=23 GlideScope®Video Laryngoscope for Difficult Intubation: Implication of the Size of Blade
Intubation; Difficult
Primary: The Differences in the Glottis View (C&L Grade) of Macintosh Laryngoscope and GVL Selected by Weight. — 6; 5.5 units on a scale — p=<0.05
N/A N=1,420 DirEct Versus VIdeo LaryngosCopE Trial
Acute Respiratory Failure
Primary: Number of Intubations With Successful Intubation on the First Attempt — 600; 504 Participants
N/A N=100 King Vision Video Laryngoscope Ambu (aBlade) System for Use in Children
Pediatric Anesthesia · King Vision Video Laryngoscope Intubation
Primary: Ease of Endotracheal Intubation — 65 participants
N/A N=140 Video-laryngoscope With a Novel Video-stylet for Difficult Intubation
Difficult Endotracheal Intubation
Primary: Intubation Time — 66; 71 time in seconds — p=<0.05
N/A N=130 McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy in Morbidly Obese Patients
Morbid Obesity
Primary: Classification of Glottis Visualization — 45; 23; 11; 16 Participants — p=<0.01
N/A N=7,908 Endotracheal Intubation Using Videolaryngoscopy Versus Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy
Intubation · Laryngoscopy
Primary: The Number of Intubation Attempts With the Initial Laryngoscopy Instrument. — 4336; 3710; 70; 277 Surgical procedures — p=<0.001
N/A N=394 McGrath Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy Rapid Sequence Intubation
Surgery
Primary: Visualization of the Vocal Cords — 90; 85; 63; 67 Participants — p=0.26
N/A N=660 Success of Pediatric Anesthesiologists in Learning to Use Videolaryngoscopes
Tracheal Intubation Morbidity
Primary: Success in Learning to Use a Videolaryngoscope(VLS) — 37.5; 62.5; 25; 0 percent of anesthesiologists — p=>0.05
N/A N=100 McGRATH MAC Video Laryngoscope
Intubation; Difficult
Primary: Number of Participants Successfully Intubated on First Attempt With Use of Either a Direct or Indirect Laryngoscopic View — 72; 16 Participants
Phase 4 N=94 Effectiveness and Safety of the Levitan Scope for Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation With a Simulated Difficult Airway
Airway Complication of Anaesthesia
Primary: Cormack-Lehane Grade — 58; 53; 33; 41 participants
N/A N=623 GlideScope Versus Direct Laryngoscope for Emergency Intubation
Oral Intubation
Primary: Number of Participants Who Survived to Hospital Discharge — 296; 275 Participants
N/A N=92 Head Motion in Pediatric Patients Endotracheally Intubated With Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy
Intubation; Difficult · Cervical Spine Injury
Primary: Head Motion - Extension or Flexion — 16.5; 17.7 degrees of extension
N/A N=100 Evaluation of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients With Head and Neck Pathology
Difficult Intubation
Primary: Number of Participants With Cormack-Lehane Grade >2 Obtained With CMAC D Blade — 37 Participants
N/A N=49 A Comparison of the Infant Truview EVO2 Video Laryngoscope and the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Pediatric Patients
Laryngoscopy
Primary: Quality of Laryngeal View Obtained on Comarck Lehane Classification — 21; 13; 3; 5 Participants — p=0.17
N/A N=388 Efficiency of the King Vision Video Laryngoscope
Respiratory Failure · Intubation
Primary: Intubation Success Rate — 22; 13; 366; 375 participants — p=0.119
N/A N=125 Intraoperative Video Laryngoscopy as Adjunct for Nerve Monitoring
Vocal Cord Function in Neck Procedures
Primary: Frequency of Congruence of Nerve Integrity and Vocal Cord Functions — 68; 13; 17; 10 nerves at risk
N/A N=28 Study: Study to Compare Video Miller Device to Direct Laryngoscopy
Surgeries Undergoing General Anesthesia
Primary: Time to Obtain Glottic View — 9.2; 8.4 seconds
N/A N=99 Nasal Intubation Using King Vision Video Laryngoscopy
Nasal Intubation
Primary: Time to Intubation — 37.6; 35.4; 46.8 second
N/A N=160 Standard Versus Flexible Tip Bougie for Videolaryngoscopy
Intubation, Intratracheal
Primary: Modified Intubation Difficulty Scale Score (mIDS) — 1; 0 score on a scale range of 0 to 10 number
N/A N=140 Stylet Angle for McGrath Videolaryngoscopy
Intubation
Primary: Time to Intubation — 32.5; 29.3 seconds
N/A N=90 Effectiveness of Video System in Improving Learning of Tracheal Intubation Using Standard Laryngoscopy Among Novices
Intubation Intraesophageal
Primary: Successful Endotracheal Intubation — 33.3; 83.3 % successful — p=.001
N/A N=240 Comparison Study in Adult Surgical Patients of 5 Airway Devices
Laryngoscopy · Intubation
Primary: Percentage Distribution of Cook's Modification of Cormack-Lehane's Grading System. Each Study Subject Will Receive a Grade of 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, or 4 in the…
N/A N=30 Force and Pressure Distribution Using Macintosh and GlideScope Laryngoscopes in Normal Airway: an in Vivo Study
Tracheal Intubation · Laryngoscopy
Primary: Force Applied and Pressure Distribution Upon the Blade of Laryngoscopes During Tracheal Intubation. — 16; 10; 40; 8 Newton
N/A N=66 Comparison Study of the McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope With the King Vision
Video Laryngoscopic Device Usage in Novice Users
Primary: Intubation Success on First Attempt as Measured by End Tidal Carbon Dioxide — 24; 33 participants
Phase 4 N=121 Comparative Effectiveness of Intubating Devices in the Morbidly Obese
Obesity
Primary: Intubation Time Using a Stop Watch — 43; 22; 45; 40 Seconds
Phase 3 N=80 Video Double-Lumen Tube Prospective Randomized Study
Other Surgical Procedures
Primary: Number of Participants With Fiberoptic Use During Surgeries Requiring Lung Isolation — 42; 5 Participants — p=<0.0001