Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=57 Randomized Supportive Care

Radiotherapy Related Skin Toxicity: Mepitel® vs. Standard Care in Patients With Locally Advanced Head-and-Neck Cancer

Head and Neck Neoplasms

Enrolled (actual)
57
Serious AEs
29.8%
Results posted
Mar 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Grade ≥2 Radiation Dermatitis at 50 Gy (Per Protocol Set) — 3; 9; 6; 18 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Mepitel® Film (Other); Standard Care (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
Primary completion
Jul 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Grade ≥2 Radiation Dermatitis at 50 Gy (Per Protocol Set)
3; 9; 6; 18
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Grade ≥2 Radiation Dermatitis at 60 Gy (Per Protocol Set)
4; 15; 3; 11
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Radiation Dermatitis at 50 Gy (Per Protocol Set)
0; 0; 9; 27
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Radiation Dermatitis at 60 Gy (Per Protocol Set)
1; 3; 6; 23
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Grade ≥2 Radiation Dermatitis at 50 Gy (Intention-to-treat Population)
8; 10; 15; 18
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Grade ≥2 Radiation Dermatitis at 60 Gy (Intention-to-treat Population)
15; 16; 8; 11
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Radiation Dermatitis at 50 Gy (Intention-to-treat Population)
0; 0; 23; 28
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Radiation Dermatitis at 60 Gy (Intention-to-treat Population)
1; 3; 22; 24
SECONDARY
Median Number of Radiation Fractions Until Occurence of Grade 2 Dermatitis
23; 23
SECONDARY
Median Pain Score at the Irradiated Skin at 50 Gy
0.0; 0.0
SECONDARY
Median Pain Score at the Irradiated Skin at 60 Gy
2.0; 2.5
SECONDARY
Change in Quality of Life Between Screening and 50 Gy of Radiotherapy
11.11; 19.79; -2.22; -15.0; 0.0; -16.67

Summary

The aim for the present study named RAREST (RAdiotherapy RElated Skin Toxicity) is to compare the new dressing with the standard skin care. 168 patients receiving radiotherapy alone or radiochemotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer will be included. The primary aim is to investigate the rate of patients experiencing severe, stressful radiation dermatitis. The skin status will daily be inspected and assessed by specially trained doctors and nursing staff. It is expected that the new self-adhesive dressing is superior to standard care with respect to prevention of grade ≥2 radiation dermatitis in patients receiving radiotherapy or radio(chemo)therapy for a head-and-neck tumor. Thus, the dressing would be well qualified to become a new standard procedure at the skin care of patients with a head-neck tumor.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Histologically proven locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head-and-neck (SCCHN)
  • Conventionally fractionated (5x2 Gy per week) definitive or adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Written informed consent
  • Capacity of the patient to contract

Exclusion Criteria

  • N3 stage (lymph nodes >6 cm)
  • Distant metastases (M1)
  • Pregnancy, Lactation
  • Treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-antibodies (either given or planned)
  • Expected non-compliance
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03047174). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search