Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=1,048 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

A Study to Evaluate the Comparative Efficacy of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) and Secukinumab for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque-type Psoriasis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03090100 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
1,048
Serious AEs
6.7%
Results posted
Oct 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-90 Response at Week 48 — 84.5; 70.0 Percentage of participants — p=<0.001
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
372citations · ~53 / year
Guselkumab versus secukinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (ECLIPSE): results from a phase 3, randomised controlled trial.
Lancet (London, England) · 2019 · Likely link

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab compared with secukinumab for the treatment of participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis.

Linked Publications (4)

  • Guselkumab versus secukinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (ECLIPSE): results from a phase 3, randomised controlled trial.
    Lancet (London, England) · 2019 · 372 citations · Likely link
  • Long-Term Safety of Guselkumab in Patients with Psoriatic Disease: An Integrated Analysis of Eleven Phase II/III Clinical Studies in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis.
    Drug safety · 2024 · 53 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Differential Pharmacodynamic Effects on Psoriatic Biomarkers by Guselkumab Versus Secukinumab Correlate with Long-Term Efficacy: An ECLIPSE Substudy.
    JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2024 · 8 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Response Types and Factors Associated with Response Types to Biologic Therapies in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis from Two Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Dermatology and therapy · 2024 · 7 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)-90 Response at Week 48
84.5; 70.0 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Both Week 12 and 48
84.6; 80.2 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Week 12
69.1; 76.1
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Week 12
89.3; 91.6
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-100 Response at Week 48
58.2; 48.4
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) at Week 48
62.2; 50.4
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 48
85.0; 74.9
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Both Week 16 and 48
72.3; 64.4
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-75 Response at Week 16
92.7; 92.8
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at Week 16
78.5; 79.6
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a PASI-90 Response at All 7 Visits From Week 24 Through Week 48
71.0; 61.5
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
86.7; 86.6
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 12
85.6; 86.4
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI-75 Response at Week 48 Among PASI-75 Responders at Week 12
94.8; 87.5
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI-90 Response at Week 48 Among PASI-90 Responders at Week 16
92.1; 80.9
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI Response (PASI 100, PASI-90, PASI-75 and PASI-50) Over Time From Week 1 to Week 56
0; 0; 0; 0; 2.1; 1.8
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With IGA Responses Through Week 56
0; 0; 3.4; 2.5; 27.2; 34.2
SECONDARY
Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Through Week 56
20.30; 24.72; 37.85; 44.56; 52.76; 60.57

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Have a diagnosis of plaque-type psoriasis (with or without [Psoriatic Arthritis]PsA) for at least 6 months before the first administration of study drug
  • A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and at Week 0 and agree to urine pregnancy testing before receiving injections
  • Agree not to receive a live virus or live bacterial vaccination during the study, or within 3 months after the last administration of study drug
  • Agree not to receive a Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination during the study, or within 12 months after the last administration of study drug
  • Agree to avoid prolonged sun exposure and avoid use of tanning booths or other ultraviolet light sources during study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Has a history or current signs or symptoms of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neurologic, hematologic, rheumatologic, psychiatric, or metabolic disturbances
  • Has previously received guselkumab or secukinumab
  • Has a history of chronic or recurrent infectious disease, including but not limited to chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection (example bronchiectasis), recurrent urinary tract infection (recurrent pyelonephritis or chronic nonremitting cystitis), fungal infection (mucocutaneous candidiasis), or open, draining, or infected skin wounds or ulcers
  • Has a history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly
  • Is unable or unwilling to undergo multiple venipunctures because of poor tolerability or lack of easy access to veins
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03090100) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search