N/A
N=150
Utility of Ultrasound in Identification of Midline and Placement of Epidural in Severely Obese Parturients
Epidural Anesthesia · Spinal Ultrasound · Obesity
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03100968 ↗Enrolled (actual)
150
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Time for Epidural Placement — 9.0; 6.2 minutes
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Palpation (Procedure); Ultrasound (Device)
- Age
- Adult · 19+ yrs
- Sex
- Female
- Sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Primary completion
- Oct 2018
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Time for Epidural Placement |
9.0; 6.2 | — |
| PRIMARY Number of Needle Passes |
2.8; 2.1 | — |
| PRIMARY Total Time |
9.5; 6.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Time to Identify Midline |
30.9; 44.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Epidural Failure Rate |
7; 3 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Top-offs Required |
0.5; 0.4 | — |
Summary
This study will address the utility of ultrasound in the placement of an epidural catheter in severely obese parturients. Identification of midline can often be difficult using the standard method of palpation in obese patients. The Investigator will determine if the use of ultrasound decreases the amount of time and number of attempts required to place the epidural.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- patient request for a labor epidural
- BMI≥35
Exclusion Criteria
- BMI<35
- patient refusal of a labor epidural
- coagulopathy
- platelets<80,000
- prior spine procedure or instrumentation
- a diagnosis of scoliosis
- an intracranial or spinal mass
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03100968). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.