Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=403 Randomized Treatment

ELEKT-D: Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) vs. Ketamine in Patients With Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)

Depression · Electroconvulsive Therapy · ECT · Ketamine
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03113968 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
403
Serious AEs
2.5%
Results posted
Aug 2023
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Participants With Treatment Responses Based on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report Scale (QIDS-SR-16) — 70; 108 Participants — p=<.001
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
262citations · ~87 / year
Ketamine versus ECT for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression.
The New England journal of medicine · 2023 · Likely link

Summary

The goal of the study is to conduct a comparative randomized trial of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) vs. ketamine for patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD) in a real world setting with patient reported outcomes as primary and secondary outcome measures.

Linked Publications (3)

  • Ketamine versus ECT for Nonpsychotic Treatment-Resistant Major Depression.
    The New England journal of medicine · 2023 · 262 citations · Likely link
  • ELEctroconvulsive therapy (ECT) vs. Ketamine in patients with Treatment-resistant Depression: The ELEKT-D study protocol.
    Contemporary clinical trials · 2019 · 54 citations · Likely link
  • Comparing the Cognitive Effects of Repeated Intravenous Ketamine and Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Secondary Analysis of the ELEKT-D Trial.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry · 2025 · 0 citations · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Treatment Responses Based on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report Scale (QIDS-SR-16)
70; 108 <.001 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Treatment Responses Based on the Montgomery-Åsberg Rating Scale (MADRS)
70; 99

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Written informed consent before any study related procedures are performed
  • Inpatients or outpatients referred by their providers for ECT treatment and eligible for ECT treatment
  • Males/females at least 21 years of age but no older than 75 years of age
  • Meet DSM-5 criteria for Major Depressive Episode as determined by both:

A. a clinician's diagnostic evaluation and B. confirmed with the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI 7.0.2)

  • A current depressive episode that has lasted a minimum of 4 weeks
  • Meet all of the following criteria on symptom rating scales at screening:

A. Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score >20 B. Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) of ≤ 5 C. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) of ≥18

  • Have had ≥2 adequate trials of antidepressants or augmentation strategies during their lifetime. An adequate trial is defined as 4 weeks of medication at the minimum FDA approved dose. This will be equal to a trial rating of 3 or more.
  • In the opinion of the investigator, the patient is willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, and other trial procedures for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Meet DSM-5 criteria for bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, mental retardation, or pervasive developmental disorder
  • Meets any exclusion criteria for ECT or ketamine treatment as described in the clinical guidelines or according to investigator judgment
  • The patient is pregnant or breast feeding
  • The patient has a severe medical illness or severe neurological disorder
  • The patient has a known ketamine allergy or is taking a medication that may interact with ketamine
  • Diagnosis of major depressive disorder with psychotic features during the current depressive episode
  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Was previously enrolled/randomized into the trial
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03113968) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search