Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=2,105 Randomized Treatment

Efficacy and Safety of Olokizumab in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid Arthritis
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03120949 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
2,105
Serious AEs
11.8%
Results posted
Jun 2022
Primary outcomePrimary: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), by System Organ Class and Preferred Term (Safety Population) — 401; 408; 71; 87 Participants
◆ Published Evidence
Not yet cited
0citations
Olokizumab Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis up to 106 Weeks (Results from the Open-Label Extension of Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials).
Rheumatology and therapy · 2026 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of olokizumab (OKZ) 64 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) once every 2 weeks (q2w) or once every 4 weeks (q4w) in subjects with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who previously had completed 24 weeks of double-blind treatment in Study CREDO 1, 2 or 3 (core studies). The long-term efficacy, immunogenicity, the physical function and quality of life of subjects received long-term treatment with OKZ were assessed as well.

Linked Publications

  • Olokizumab Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis up to 106 Weeks (Results from the Open-Label Extension of Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials).
    Rheumatology and therapy · 2026 · 0 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), by System Organ Class and Preferred Term (Safety Population)
401; 408; 71; 87; 59; 67
PRIMARY
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), by System Organ Class and Preferred Term (Safety Population)
129; 120; 40; 47; 7; 7
PRIMARY
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
389; 398; 19; 22; 9; 6
PRIMARY
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent AEs Leading to Withdrawal of the Study Treatment
87; 90
PRIMARY
Incidence Rate of Treatment Emergent AEs Per Patient-years of Exposure
48.75; 49.84
PRIMARY
Incidence Rate of Treatment Emergent SAEs Per Patient-years of Exposure
7.74; 7.37
PRIMARY
Incidence Rate of Treatment Emergent AESIs (Safety Population)
40.49; 42.13
SECONDARY
American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response Rates Compare Against Core Baseline Through Week 82
861; 863; 850; 851; 839; 829
SECONDARY
American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response Rates Compare Against Core Baseline Through Week 82
598; 601; 607; 607; 597; 610
SECONDARY
American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response Rates Compare Against Core Baseline Through Week 82
330; 362; 358; 353; 367; 357
SECONDARY
Proportion of Subjects With Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission Through Week 82
0; 0; 137; 145; 161; 190
SECONDARY
Disease Activity Score 28-joint Count (DAS28) Response Rates Through Week 82
1; 1; 573; 537; 681; 685
SECONDARY
Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Core Baseline at Week 12
1.70; 1.74; 1.03; 1.00; -0.67; -0.74
SECONDARY
Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Core Baseline at Week 20
1.70; 1.74; 1.00; 0.99; -0.70; -0.74
SECONDARY
Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Core Baseline at Week 28
1.70; 1.74; 0.99; 0.99; -0.71; -0.75
SECONDARY
Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Core Baseline at Week 40
1.70; 1.74; 0.97; 0.99; -0.72; -0.75
SECONDARY
Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Core Baseline at Week 52
1.70; 1.74; 0.97; 0.96; -0.72; -0.77
SECONDARY
Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Core Baseline at Week 64
1.70; 1.74; 0.95; 0.97; -0.74; -0.77
SECONDARY
Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Core Baseline at Week 82
1.70; 1.74; 0.97; 0.98; -0.72; -0.74
SECONDARY
Proportion of Subjects With Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Improvement Through Week 82
297; 324; 319; 341; 326; 320
SECONDARY
Changes From Core Baseline Over Time in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
40.20; 40.06; 10.92; 10.54; -29.35; -29.54

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects may be enrolled in the study only if they meet all of the following criteria:

  • Subject must be willing and able to sign informed consent
  • Subject must have completed the 24-week double-blind Treatment Period in 1 of the 3 core studies (CL04041022, CL04041023, or CL04041025).
  • Subject must have maintained their stable dose (and route) of MTX 15 to 25 mg/week (or ≥ 10 mg/week if there is documented intolerance to higher doses) during the core study and plan to maintain the same dose and route of administration for ≥ 12 additional weeks
  • Subjects must be willing to take folic acid or equivalent throughout the study.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subject with any medically important condition in the core study (e.g., clinically significant laboratory values, frequent Adverse events (AEs) or serious adverse events (SAEs), infection SAEs, and/or other concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical condition) which would make this subject unsuitable for inclusion in the open-label extension (OLE) study in the Investigator's judgement.
  • Subject has evidence of active tuberculosis (TB)
  • Subject with a positive or repeated indeterminate interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) result at Week 22 of the core study
  • Subjects may be enrolled in the OLE study if they fulfill all 3 of the following criteria prior to the first dose of study treatment:
  • Active TB is ruled out by a certified TB specialist or pulmonologist who is familiar with diagnosing and treating TB (as acceptable per local practice);
  • The subject starts prophylaxis for latent TB infection (LTBI) according to country-specific/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines (treatment with isoniazid for 6 months is not an appropriate prophylactic regime for this study and it should not be used); and
  • The subject is willing to complete the entire course of recommended LTBI therapy.
  • Subject has planned surgery during the first 12 weeks of the OLE study
  • Female subjects who are pregnant or who are planning to become pregnant during the study or within 6 months of the last dose of study drug
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential (unless permanent cessation of menstrual periods, determined retrospectively after a woman has experienced 12 months of natural amenorrhea as defined by the amenorrhea with underlying status [e.g., correlative age] or 6 months of natural amenorrhea with documented serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels >40 mIU/mL and estradiol <20 pg/mL) who are not willing to use a highly effective method of contraception during the study and for at least 6 months after the last administration of study treatment OR Male subjects with partners of childbearing potential not willing to use a highly effective method of contraception during the study and for at least 3 months after the last administration of study treatment.

Highly effective contraception is defined as:

  • Female sterilization surgery: hysterectomy, surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy) or tubal ligation at least 6 weeks prior to the first dose of study treatment in the core study
  • In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by documented follow-up hormone level assessment
  • Total abstinence if it is the preferred and constant lifestyle of the subject. Thus, periodic abstinence such as ovulation, symptothermal, postovulation, calendar methods, and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.
  • Male sterilization surgery: at least 6 months prior to the first dose of study treatment in the core study (with the appropriate postvasectomy documentation of the absence of sperm in the ejaculate). For female subjects, the vasectomized male should be the only partner.
  • Placement of established intrauterine device (IUD): IUD copper or IUD with progesterone
  • Barrier method (condom and intravaginal spermicide, cervical caps with spermicide, or diaphragm with
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03120949) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search