Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=77 Randomized Other

Sex Differences, Cognitive Training & Emotion Processing

Alcohol Use Disorder

Enrolled (actual)
77
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Emotional Stroop: Change From Baseline in Reaction Time — 336; 162; 78.3 milliseconds — p=.0078

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Affective Training (Other); Neutral Training (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 25+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Florida
Primary completion
Feb 2021

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Emotional Stroop: Change From Baseline in Reaction Time
336; 162; 78.3 .0078 sig
PRIMARY
Trail-Making Task A: Change From Baseline in Task Completion Time
PRIMARY
Trail-Making Task B: Change From Baseline in Task Completion Time
PRIMARY
Digit Symbol Substitution: Change From Baseline in Translated Symbols
PRIMARY
Little Man Task: Change From Baseline in Response Accuracy.
-.0045; .125; .0483 0.393
PRIMARY
Wisconsin Card Sorting Task: Change From Baseline in Response Accuracy
PRIMARY
Sternberg Working Memory Task: Change From Baseline in Response Accuracy
.0021; 0.0298; 0.148 .0344 sig
PRIMARY
Stroop Color-Word Task: Change From Baseline in Response Time
5; -11.5; 22 .0344 sig
PRIMARY
Visual-Perceptual Analysis Task: Change From Baseline in Response Time
-1270; 121; -377 0.0365 sig
SECONDARY
Timeline Follow-back
.06; .131; .4 .212
SECONDARY
Moos Health and Daily Living Scale
1.33; .4; .25 <.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change in Profile of Mood States
-12.7; 6.67; 1.25 .445
SECONDARY
Mini Alcohol Craving Experience Questionnaire
15.7; 10; 5.2 .245

Summary

This pilot project addresses two understudied questions related to neurocognitive deficits observed in treatment-seeking alcoholics. First, whether cognitive training improves performance and outcomes in alcoholics, and whether men and women differ in their response to this training. The second is whether directed training using affective materials (e.g., emotional faces) is differentially effective compared to that using traditional (i.e., neutral) stimuli.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Minimum of 10 years of education
  • Subjects must have 20/40 or better corrected vision (determined by Snellen chart)
  • have no significant hearing impairment as determined by self-report and audiometric testing
  • must meet criteria for DSM-IV alcohol dependence using the computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule - IV
  • A craving index is also administered to allow discussion in terms of DSM 5 classification.
  • Comorbid substance use including nicotine use is not exclusionary.

Exclusion Criteria

  • May not have medical or psychiatric histories which would confound participation or data interpretation, e.g., epilepsy, stroke, untreated hypertension, psychotic disorders, anxiolytic medications.
  • not be color blind (as determined by psuedoisochromatic plates)
  • Endorsement of suicidal intent
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03137654). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search