Phase 4
N=78
A Novel Analgesia Technique for ACL Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03292926 ↗Enrolled (actual)
78
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Pain While at Rest — 3.84; 3.95 score on a scale
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Interventions
- Bupivacaine (Drug); Ultrasound (Device); Dexamethasone (Drug)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 13+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
- Primary completion
- Mar 2020
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Pain While at Rest |
3.84; 3.95 | — |
| SECONDARY Discharge Criteria |
180.67; 189.92 | — |
| SECONDARY Pain With Ambulation |
1.59; 1.26; 2.05; 2.1 | — |
Summary
A comparison of two anesthetic techniques-- the Adductor Canal Block (ACB) and the Adductor Canal Block with Infiltration of the interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (ACB/IPACK)-- in patients undergoing bone-tendon-bone (BTB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients undergoing BTB ACL reconstruction with participating surgeon
- Age 13 or greater
- Planned use of regional anesthesia
- Ability to follow study protocol
- English speaking (secondary outcomes include questionnaires validated in English only)
Exclusion Criteria
- Hepatic or renal insufficiency
- Younger than 13 years old
- Patients undergoing general anesthesia
- Allergy or intolerance to one of the study medications
- BMI > 40
- Diabetes
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score IV
- Chronic gabapentin/pregabalin use (regular use for longer than 3 months)
- Chronic opioid use (taking opioids for longer than 3 months, or daily morphine equivalent of >5mg/day for one month)
- Non-English speaking
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03292926). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.