N/A
Completed N=63
Ultrasound Guided Knee Injections in Musculoskeletal Medicine
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03293238 ↗Enrolled (actual)
63
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Participants With Successful Knee Injection — 17; 14; 13; 7 Participants
Summary
This study will compare the accuracy and patient reported outcomes between four different techniques used to perform a knee injection.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Number of Participants With Successful Knee Injection |
17; 14; 13; 7 | — |
| SECONDARY Procedural Satisfaction Score at 3 Months Post Injection |
7.84; 8.71; 7.14; 8.29 | 0.527 |
| SECONDARY Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Score |
48.05; 43.75; 53.15; 47.61; 23.42; 31.07 | 0.749 |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Male or female, age 18 to 90
- Clinician determined need for intra-articular knee injection
- Radiograph confirmed grade 1-4 Kellgren Lawrence osteoarthritis scale
Exclusion Criteria
- Allergy to contrast dye, shellfish
- Allergy to egg product or hyaluronate
- Allergy to lidocaine
- Localized skin infection at planned site of injection
- Inability to complete follow-up phone call three months following the injection
- Viscosupplementation injection within 6 months of the current evaluation
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03293238). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.