N/A N=50

Clinical Comparison of Length of Cataract Procedures With Zeiss Lumera Versus Older Zeiss Microscope

Cataract

Bottom Line

View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03298841 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

0.0%

Results posted

Apr 2021

Primary outcome: Primary: Improvement in Operating Room Efficiencies During Cataract Surgery With the Use of the New Lumera Operating Microscope Versus an Older Zeiss Model Operating Scope — 11.15; 14.18 minutes per surgical procedure

Study Design & Population

Study type: Observational
Phase: N/A
Interventions: Zeiss (Device)
Age: Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex: All
Sponsor: Toyos Clinic
Primary completion: Sep 2017

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Improvement in Operating Room Efficiencies During Cataract Surgery With the Use of the New Lumera Operating Microscope Versus an Older Zeiss Model Operating Scope	11.15; 14.18	—
SECONDARY Number of Serious Adverse Events During Intra-operative and Post-operative Period	—	—

Summary

Study design will be a mix of retrospective (older Zeiss microscope previously in use at our surgery center) and prospective data collection with the Lumera and Callisto software. The Lumera and Callisto software system will be used for all cataract surgeries including toric analyses and lens placement.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Visually significant cataract

Exclusion Criteria

Not visually significant cataract

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03298841). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.