Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=569 Randomized Screening

EndoRings Colonoscopy vs Standard Colonoscopy

Colorectal Adenoma · Colorectal Polyp · Colon Cancer

Enrolled (actual)
569
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Adenoma Detection Rates — 143; 124 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
EndoRings device (Device)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
Indiana University
Primary completion
Sep 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Adenoma Detection Rates
143; 124
PRIMARY
Number of Adenomas Per Colonoscopy
1.46; 1.06
SECONDARY
Polyp Detection Rate
199; 188
SECONDARY
Number of Detections Per Colonoscopy
2.29; 1.82
SECONDARY
Total Number of Detections
415; 295; 650; 506
SECONDARY
Cecal Intubation Rate
281; 277
SECONDARY
Time Comparison for Each Method
6.3; 5.5; 11.8; 12.8; 19.4; 19.5
SECONDARY
Patient Comfort Score
0.47; 0.36
SECONDARY
Problems Encountered With Equipment
17; 25

Summary

The study aims to compare the results between a standard colonoscopy to a colonoscopy with an attachment on the distal end of the colonoscope.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy
  • Able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known narrow colon or colon stenosis
  • Personal history of Colorectal cancer
  • History of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome (FAP)
  • Hyperplastic polyposis syndrome
  • Referral for incomplete colonoscopy or polyp clearance
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03418662). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search