N/A
Completed N=569
EndoRings Colonoscopy vs Standard Colonoscopy
Colorectal adenoma · Colorectal Polyp · Colorectal Cancer
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03418662 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
569
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Adenoma Detection Rates — 143; 124 Participants
Summary
The study aims to compare the results between a standard colonoscopy to a colonoscopy with an attachment on the distal end of the colonoscope.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Adenoma Detection Rates |
143; 124 | — |
| PRIMARY Number of Adenomas Per Colonoscopy |
1.46; 1.06 | — |
| SECONDARY Polyp Detection Rate |
199; 188 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Detections Per Colonoscopy |
2.29; 1.82 | — |
| SECONDARY Total Number of Detections |
415; 295; 650; 506 | — |
| SECONDARY Cecal Intubation Rate |
281; 277 | — |
| SECONDARY Time Comparison for Each Method |
6.3; 5.5; 11.8; 12.8; 19.4; 19.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Patient Comfort Score |
0.47; 0.36 | — |
| SECONDARY Problems Encountered With Equipment |
17; 25 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy
- Able to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Known narrow colon or colon stenosis
- Personal history of Colorectal cancer
- History of inflammatory bowel disease
- Familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome (FAP)
- Hyperplastic polyposis syndrome
- Referral for incomplete colonoscopy or polyp clearance
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03418662). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.