Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=54 Randomized Treatment

Systematized Quality Exercise Alternatives for Stress Incontinence

Stress Urinary Incontinence · Pelvic Floor; Weak · Incontinence, Urinary · Quality of Life

Enrolled (actual)
54
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Quality of Life — 4.73; 3.95 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy (Behavioral); Home Biofeedback (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
University of New Mexico
Primary completion
Mar 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Quality of Life
4.73; 3.95
SECONDARY
Sexual Function
0.42; 1.81

Summary

This randomized controlled study evaluates the effect of home biofeedback compared to pelvic floor physical therapy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Half of the participants will use a home biofeedback device for 3 months and the other half will attend pelvic floor physical therapy appointments for 3 months.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Female Subjects >18 years of age
  • SUI or Mixed UI with stress predominant symptoms and more bother by the SUI
  • English speaking/reading
  • Own a smartphone that can support phone application and Bluetooth for the biofeedback device
  • Willing to come for 4 PFPT visits over 3 months if randomized

Exclusion Criteria

  • Prior anti-incontinence surgery
  • Had prior pelvic floor physical therapy for SUI
  • Prolapse of any compartment noted below the hymen
  • Inability to speak/understand English
  • Pregnant
  • Decline or unable to return for frequent PT visits during study period
  • Unable to be contacted for follow up by telephone
  • Neurologic disorders known to cause neurogenic bladder
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03443687). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search