N/A
Completed N=238
Quad Resection (Hot Snare vs Cold Snare vs Hot EMR vs Cold EMR)
Colorectal Cancer · Colon Polyp · Colon Adenoma
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03462706 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
238
Serious AEs
0.9%
Results posted
Feb 2023
Primary outcomePrimary: Efficacy of Resection (Central Post-Resection Biopsies) — 68; 82; 69; 63 Polyps
Summary
The study will compare the use of cold snare, hot snare, cold EMR, and hot EMR for polyp resection. Although previous studies have compared two of the potential resection methods, no previous study has evaluated all four of the resection methods.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Efficacy of Resection (Central Post-Resection Biopsies) |
68; 82; 69; 63; 0; 0 | — |
| PRIMARY Efficacy of Resection (Peripheral Post-Resection Biopsies) |
68; 81; 70; 62; 0; 1 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Aged 40 years or older
- Ability to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Subjects with a history of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Lesions less than 6mm or greater than 15mm in largest dimension
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03462706). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.