Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=100 Randomized Treatment

Vacuum vs Manual Drainage During Unilateral Thoracentesis

Pleural Effusion · Pleural Diseases · Thoracic Diseases

Enrolled (actual)
100
Serious AEs
5.0%
Results posted
Aug 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Pain Change — 0.53; 1.43 Pre-post NPRS Pain Scale Score

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Vacuum Bottle Drainage (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Yale University
Primary completion
Sep 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Pain Change
0.53; 1.43
SECONDARY
Time of Drainage
498.5; 318.6
SECONDARY
Number of Patients Who Had an Early Termination of Procedure
1; 8
SECONDARY
Number of Patients Who Had a Complication as a Result of the Procedure
0; 3; 0; 1; 0; 1
SECONDARY
Etiology of Effusion
13; 8; 7; 2; 7; 8
SECONDARY
Volume of Effusion
1023; 1143
SECONDARY
Laterality of Effusion
17; 23; 32; 28

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if there are any differences in terms of safety, pain, or drainage speed between thoracenteses via manual drainage vs vacuum suction.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients undergoing unilateral therapeutic thoracentesis

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with a history of prior significant pleural or lung based procedures/surgeries (not a simple thoracentesis)
  • Prior enrollment in this study
  • Patients ability to comprehend and consent to this procedure and clearly communicate any pain or other symptoms that arise from this procedure
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03496987). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search