Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=5,217 Health Services Research

An Evaluation of the Team Birth Project

Pregnancy Complications · Cesarean Section Complications · Maternal Complication of Pregnancy · Communication, Multidisciplinary

Enrolled (actual)
5,217
Serious AEs
2.3%
Results posted
May 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Percent of Clinicians Recommending TeamBirth Project — 254; 83; 25; 13 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Exposed study site (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
Primary completion
Sep 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percent of Clinicians Recommending TeamBirth Project
254; 83; 25; 13; 0
PRIMARY
Percent of Patients With the Role They Wanted in Decision-Making
726; 68; 5; 4; 2

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a pilot project to improve communication and teamwork and to increase vaginal delivery rates at hospital in the United States

Eligibility Criteria

Clinician Participant Inclusion Criteria:

  • All clinicians who have practice privileges at a study site

Clinician Participant Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Implementation Team Participant Inclusion Criteria:

  • Champions, super-users and others who have been involved in the implementation of "Team Birth Project" at a study site

Implementation Team Participant Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Patient Participant Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • Live birth. Includes: spontaneous or induction of labor; Vaginally, with an instruments (forceps / vacuum), or unscheduled cesarean delivery
  • Patient at a study site piloting "Team Birth Project"

Patient Participant Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years old
  • Scheduled cesarean delivery
  • Experienced intrapartum, stillbirth, or neonatal death
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03529214). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search