N/A
N=60
Survival of Endocrowns Made From Different Ceramics
Pulp Disease, Dental · Dental Caries · Dental Leakage
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03542019 ↗Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Survival of Dental Prosthesis — 19; 14; 17 Teeth
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Dental prosthesis (Device); Dental crown (Device); Hybrid ceramic (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University of Jordan
- Primary completion
- Dec 2020
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Survival of Dental Prosthesis |
19; 14; 17 | — |
Summary
Restoration of endodontically treated teeth requires a means to protect the cusps from the wedging forces of occlusion. When there is extensive loss of tooth structure, cuspal coverage is warranted. Usually this is in the form of indirect restoration. Traditionally, full coverage crowns have been used which would require further removal of sound tooth structure. Recently, adhesive alternatives have been introduced which allow for conservation of tooth structure.
Different materials can be used for this purpose. The evidence on the long-term survival of these materials is scarce. This study aims to investigate the short and medium-long term survival rate of these prostheses.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Root canal treated molars with significant loss of tooth structure
- Supra-gingival margins
- Teeth scheduled for cuspal-covering indirect restorations
Exclusion Criteria
- Teeth with extensive cracks or fractures
- Teeth with deep subgingival margins
- Non-functional teeth (no opposing dentition)
- Teeth with advanced periodontitis
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03542019). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.