Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=359 Randomized Screening

Assessing the Effect of a Blood-based Colorectal Cancer Screening Test on Screening Adherence and Colonoscopy Completion

Colorectal Cancer

Enrolled (actual)
359
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Undergo Screening Within 6 Months of Outreach — 17; 31 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Septin9 (Diagnostic_test)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 50+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Peter S. Liang, MD MPH
Primary completion
Dec 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Undergo Screening Within 6 Months of Outreach
17; 31
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Completing Screening Strategy
16; 27
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Colonoscopy Follow-up in Intervention Group
1
SECONDARY
Self-reported Willingness to Take Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening on Questionnaire
65
SECONDARY
Self-reported Most Common Advantages of Blood Test on Questionnaire
46; 31; 24
SECONDARY
Self-reported Most Common Reasons for Refusing Blood Test on Questionnaire in Intervention Group
4; 3

Summary

Objectives: Colonoscopy and stool-based testing are the two predominant colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests used in the US, and both reduce colorectal cancer mortality. However, only 62% of Americans are up to date with screening, partly because many individuals find these two tests inconvenient or unacceptable for a variety of reasons. There is an unmet need for a non-invasive test that does not require bowel preparation or handling stool, and the Septin9 DNA blood test may be an alternative for those individuals who would otherwise remain unscreened. Aims: Aim 1: To measure screening uptake with a blood test in screen-resistant patients who have declined both colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) at the Manhattan VA Medical Center * Sub-Aim 1a: To assess the proportion of those with a positive blood-based screening test who undergo diagnostic colonoscopy * Sub-Aim 1b: To describe the endoscopic findings on diagnostic colonoscopy Aim 2: To survey screen-resistant patients to understand their beliefs and attitudes about colorectal cancer screening and testing options We hypothesize that a substantial proportion of patients who have refused colonoscopy and FIT will accept the blood test. We hypothesize this will be driven by the convenience of the blood test. Methods: This will be randomized controlled trial of individuals who have refused colonoscopy and FIT within past 6 months. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to the intervention or control group. Both groups will be invited to participate in navigated colonoscopy or FIT by letter and telephone call. The intervention group will also be invited to participate in the blood test if they refuse colonoscopy and FIT. We will enroll 180 participants in each group (total n=360).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • not up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening, defined as a colonoscopy in the past 10 years, a stool test (FOBT/FIT) in the past year, or a flexible sigmoidoscopy in the past 5 years.
  • Declined colorectal cancer screening (both colonoscopy and FIT) in the previous 6 months, which must be documented in the electronic health record

Exclusion Criteria

  • Personal history of colonic adenomas (including sessile serrated adenomas), proximal hyperplastic polyps, CRC, inflammatory bowel disease, or hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndrome
  • First degree relative with CRC diagnosed at <60 years of age; family history of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes.
  • Vulnerable populations
  • Adult unable to consent
  • Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers)
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoners
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03598166). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search