Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 1 N=16 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

A Study of the Use of Microneedle Patches to Deliver Topical Lidocaine in the Oral Cavity

Topical Anaesthesia

Enrolled (actual)
16
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: VAS in Healthy Participants, When Topical 5% Lidocaine Dental Gel Was Applied to the Upper Palatal and Upper Anterior Buccal Sulcus Areas With a Microneedle Patch and a Patch With no Microneedles, Prior to Infiltration With Local Anaesthesia. — 5.1; 12.3; 0.7; 4.0 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Interventions
Microneedle Patch (Device); Patch with no microneedles (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Innoture Ltd
Primary completion
Aug 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
VAS in Healthy Participants, When Topical 5% Lidocaine Dental Gel Was Applied to the Upper Palatal and Upper Anterior Buccal Sulcus Areas With a Microneedle Patch and a Patch With no Microneedles, Prior to Infiltration With Local Anaesthesia.
5.1; 12.3; 0.7; 4.0; 11.9; 18.7
PRIMARY
Verbal Pain Grading, When Topical 5% Lidocaine Dental Gel is Applied to the Upper Palatal and Upper Anterior Buccal Sulcus Areas With a Microneedle Patch and a Patch With No Microneedle Patch, Prior to Infiltration With Local Anaesthesia. Test 1
8; 5; 15; 13; 8; 8
PRIMARY
Verbal Pain Grading, When Topical 5% Lidocaine Dental Gel Was Applied to the Upper Palatal and Upper Anterior Buccal Sulcus Areas With a Microneedle Patch and a Patch With No Microneedle Patch, Prior to Infiltration With Local Anaesthesia. Test 2
8; 3; 14; 11; 5; 9
PRIMARY
Verbal Pain Grading, When Topical 5% Lidocaine Dental Gel Was Applied to the Upper Palatal and Upper Anterior Buccal Sulcus Areas With a Microneedle Patch and a Patch With No Microneedle Patch, Prior to Infiltration With Local Anaesthesia. Test 3
1; 1; 3; 1; 7; 3
SECONDARY
Adverse Events in Healthy Participants When a Proprietary Topical 5% Lidocaine Dental Gel Was Applied to the Oral Mucosa With a Microneedle Patch and a Patch With no Microneedles, Prior to Infiltration With Local Anaesthesia.
0; 0; 0; 0

Summary

To look at the effect on patient perceived pain resulting from infiltration injection with local anaesthetic in a dental syringe with prior application of topical anaesthetic to the oral mucosa on a microneedle patch compared to a patch with no microneedles. To look at the safety of the patches when applied to the oral mucosa.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • be aged 18 years and over, of either gender and in good health;
  • be willing and physically able to carry out all study procedures;
  • be willing and able to give Informed Consent and provide details of any medical history;
  • be available for all of the study dates
  • have a good standard of oral hygiene and gingival health
  • must have 1 premolar or canine in each quadrant that has no/minimal restorations

Exclusion Criteria

  • presence of soft tissue oral pathology;
  • presence of advanced periodontal disease;
  • Individuals with any serious health conditions, that would preclude participation, in the professional judgement of the Study Dentist;
  • individuals with known allergies or sensitivities to local anaesthetics
  • have participated in another clinical trial in the last 30 days
  • in the opinion of the investigator unable to comply fully with the trial requirements.
  • the subject is an employee of the Sponsor or the site conducting the study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03629041). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search