Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=69 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Physical Therapist as Primary Assessor for Patients With Knee Pain in Primary Care

Knee Osteoarthritis

Enrolled (actual)
69
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Health Related Quality of Life (HrQoL) at 12 Months - EQ5D-index — 0.804; 0.825 score on a scale — p=0.87

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Physical therapy assessment (Other); Physician assessment (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 38+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Vastra Gotaland Region
Primary completion
Oct 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Health Related Quality of Life (HrQoL) at 12 Months - EQ5D-index
0.804; 0.825 0.87
PRIMARY
Change From Health Related Quality of Life (HrQoL) at 12 Months - EQ5D-VAS
81; 77 0.56
SECONDARY
Change From Pain Intensity at 12 Months
21.79; 23.29 <0.2
SECONDARY
Change From Physical Function at 12 Months
15; 15 <0.2
SECONDARY
Change From Self-efficacy at 12 Months

Summary

In order to manage the future increase in osteoarthritis consultation, patients with osteoarthritis could be assessed by a physical therapist first, so that other patients with more severe conditions could get faster access to a primary care physician. In Swedish primary care, physicians and physical therapists are primary assessors for patients with suspected knee osteoarthritis. However, it is unclear if there are any differences between these managements in improving health-related quality of life (HrQoL), pain, physical function and self-efficacy. There are a limited amount of studies about the impact on HrQoL, pain intensity, self-efficacy and physical performance in patients with knee pain being assessed and evaluated by a physical therapist as a primary assessor. The overall purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects on self-rated HrQoL, pain intensity, self-efficacy and physical performance with either a physical therapist or a physician as primary assessor for patients with knee pain within primary health care. Problem statements Which effect does a clinical pathway with a physical therapist as primary assessor for patients with knee pain… 1. … have on self-rated HrQoL compared with a physician as primary assessor? 2. … have on self-rated pain intensity compared with a physician as primary assessor? 3. … have on physical performance compared with a physician as primary assessor? 4. … have on self-efficacy compared with a physician as primary assessor? It is expected that this study will show the effects of two different primary assessors for patients with knee pain consulting primary health care. The results could clarify which profession that is most appropriate to be the primary assessor for patients with knee pain in primary health care.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age >38 years old
  • Knee pain most of the days the last month
  • Crepitus on active motion
  • Morning stiffness, duration less than 30 minutes
  • The patient has to understand the Swedish language to follow test instructions and to complete the self-administered questionnaires.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Already been assessed/diagnosed by a healthcare provider for current knee pain.
  • knee pain due to a traumatic cause
  • other rheumatic or systemic diseases
  • severe somatic or mental disease
  • pregnancy.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03715764). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search