Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=15 Randomized Other

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Pulse Widths in Spinal Cord Stimulation

Back Pain · Pain

Enrolled (actual)
15
Serious AEs
Results posted
Mar 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Effect of Pulse Widths on Pain Clinical Outcomes — 15; 0 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Algovita Spinal Cord Stimulation System (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Kettering Health Network
Primary completion
Oct 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Effect of Pulse Widths on Pain Clinical Outcomes
15; 0
SECONDARY
Change in Targeted Pain
15; 0
SECONDARY
Distribution of Paesthesia
15; 0
SECONDARY
Research Participant Program Preference
9; 6
SECONDARY
Quality of Pain Relief
6; 5; 4; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Research Participant Pain Relief Satisfaction
12; 3; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
≥ 50% Pain Relief
15; 0
SECONDARY
Rate of AEs

Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of pulse widths 1000 μsec on clinical outcomes during a temporary SCS trial.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • be eligible for SCS therapy according to the Algovita® SCS system Indications for Use statement
  • be undergoing a SCS trial using Algovita® SCS system
  • sign a valid, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved informed consent form.
  • be 18 years of age or older when written informed consent is obtained

Exclusion Criteria

  • be contraindicated for an Algovita® SCS system
  • have a cognitive impairment or exhibits any characteristic, that would limit the study candidate's ability to assess pain relief or complete study assessments
  • have a life expectancy of less than 2 years
  • be participating in another clinical study that would confound data analysis
  • have a coexisting pain condition that might confound pain ratings
  • have a significant psychiatric disorder
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03756012). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search