N/A
N=53
TEE Image Quality Improvement With Our Devised Probe Cover
Image Quality
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03812185 ↗Enrolled (actual)
53
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Image Quality Assessment Method#1: Difference in Likert Scale Before/After Suctioning — 83; 65; 2 images
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Suctioning orogastric tube which is attached to TEE probe cover (Device)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Henry Ford Health System
- Primary completion
- Dec 2019
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Image Quality Assessment Method#1: Difference in Likert Scale Before/After Suctioning |
83; 65; 2 | — |
| SECONDARY Reproducibility of the LV FAC (Inter-observer) |
0.94; 0.99 | — |
| SECONDARY Reproducibility of the LV FAC (Intra-observer) |
0.95; 1.00 | — |
| SECONDARY Reproducibility of the RV FAC (Inter-observer) |
0.89; 0.90 | — |
| SECONDARY Reproducibility of the RV FAC (Intra-observer) |
0.88; 0.85 | — |
Summary
With using suction tube attached TEE probe cover, we will assess its pinpoint suction capacity on image quality and surgical decision making.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Cardiac procedures and liver transplants which had intraoperative TEE -
Exclusion Criteria: general contraindication with TEE, apparent complications which are related to TEE.
-
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03812185). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.