30 closest matches · ranked by relevance
Arteriovenous Malformations · Aneurysm · Stenosis
Primary: Image Quality. For Each Included Participant 2 Images (1 AlluraXper; 1 AlluraClarity) Were Evaluated. — 9.4; 11.9; 13.1; 14.1 Scores on a scale
Breast Cancer Stage
Primary: Number of Participants With Imagio Image Sets Collected — 38 Participants
Breast Health
Primary: Number of Participants With Acceptable Overall Clinical Image Quality — 14; 9 Participants
Vascular Diseases
Primary: Image Quality — 0.85 proportion of readers
Image Quality
Primary: Image Quality Assessment Method#1: Difference in Likert Scale Before/After Suctioning — 83; 65; 2 images
Breast Cancer
Primary: Gain in Specificity at Fixed 98% Sensitivity (fSp) — 38.22; 47.20 % benign+TPB masses correctly identified — p=0.0268
Routine Endoscopy
Primary: Image Quality Scores Using Likert Scale — 3.2; 3.3; 3.4; 3.3 units on a scale
Cardiovascular Disease
Primary: Image Quality — 0.96 Proportion of images rated equal/better
Breast Cancer
Primary: Number of Subjects With Acceptable Overall Clinical Image Quality for Patient-assisted (PA) and Technologist-controlled (TC) Image Sets — 30; 30 Participants
Peripheral Artery Disease
Primary: Quality of Images — .702; .872; .10; .743 Clear imaging field (CIF) proportion
Cataract
Primary: Use of Corrective Visual Aids (i.e., Spectacles, Contact Lenses) Post Intraocular Lens (IOL) Surgery — 71; 8; 9 participants
Breast Cancer
Primary: Comparison of ISR (Modified Processing) to FBP (Original Processing) — 0.83; 0.83; 0.80; 0.79 5-point scale
Glaucoma
Primary: Qualitative B-Scan Assessment — 2.78; 2.77; 2.08 Mean score on a scale (0-3)
Coronary Artery Disease
Primary: Rate of Patients With Evaluable CT Scans i.e. Allowing Identification of Coronary Artery Stenosis According to Off-site Reading Assessment — 92.1; 95.4; 94.6 Percentage…
Breast Cancer
Primary: Number of Participants for Whom Study Image Data Were Collected — 642; 124; 244 Participants
Breast Cancer
Primary: Subject Comfort — 2.6; 4.0 score on a scale — p=<0.0001
Breast Cancer
Primary: Percentage of Acceptable Overall Image Quality — 30; 33; 3; 0 Participants
Pathology
Primary: Overall Percentage Agreement of Repeatability and Reproducibility Within Scanner, Between Scanners, and Sites. — 94.5; 92.4; 93.4 Average Positive Agreement Rate
Breast Cancer
Primary: Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve to Compare Diagnostic Accuracy of 2 Algorithms in Breast Cancer Diagnosis — 0.884; 0.880 probability
Prostate Cancer · Head and Neck Cancers · Upper Abdomen Cancers
Primary: Ratio of Standard CBCT to Research CBCT HU Error in Photon Therapy Participants — 1.768 Ratio (unitless) — p=0.0001
Brain Imaging · Whole Body Imaging
Primary: Motion Correction — 57.4; 13.9 percentage of voxels
Cataract
Primary: Binocular Distance-corrected Near (40 cm) Visual Acuity — 0.00 logMAR
Breast Cancer
Primary: Specificity Difference Between Imagio Optoacoustic Plus Gray-scale (OA/US) vs Imagio Gray-scale Ultrasound (IUS) — 14.9 % benign+TPB masses correctly Id'd
Cataract
Primary: Number of Emmetropic Subjects Who Are Spectacle Independent — 21 Participants
Endoscopy
Primary: Image Quality Scores Using Likert Scale — 3.3; 3.5; 3.4; 3.5 units on a scale
Spinal Injuries
Primary: Radlex Scale for Diagnostic Capability Ratings - Cedara Accustitch Software (Predicate) — 3.01 units on a scale — p=0.02
Breast Cancer
Primary: FFDM (Full Field Digital Mammography) Mammogram Scores — 12; 0 FFDM Mammogram set
Cataract · Myopia
Primary: Surface Asymmetry Index (SAI) Assessed With Corneal Topography — 0.21 unitless
TEE Image Quality
Primary: Image Quality Assessment Method#1: Difference in Likert Scale Before and After Suctioning — 79; 62; 0 image sets
CT Scanners X Ray
Primary: Image Quality — 4.53; 4.44; 4.63 units on a scale