Phase 4
N=25
Contact: Developing New Clinical Management Strategies
Major Depressive Disorder
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03812588 ↗Enrolled (actual)
25
Serious AEs
4.0%
Results posted
Apr 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24-Item Scale to Study Completion (8 Weeks) — 1.33; 11.4; 5.33; 9.25 score on a scale — p=0.292
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Interventions
- Escitalopram (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- New York State Psychiatric Institute
- Primary completion
- May 2020
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Change From Baseline Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 24-Item Scale to Study Completion (8 Weeks) |
1.33; 11.4; 5.33; 9.25 | 0.292 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale 14-item Scale |
3.67; 4.40; 6.50; 3.37 | — |
Summary
The goal of this study is to develop new methods of administering antidepressant medications that will result in improved drug/placebo separation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and enhanced medication response in open clinical treatment. The highly intensive, weekly visit schedule followed in most antidepressant RCTs radically differs from how antidepressant medications are prescribed in standard clinical practice and is believed to be a major reason why the majority of studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) fail to show a significant difference between medication and placebo. Moreover, a "one size fits all" approach to psychopharmacologic management (i.e., weekly visits for all patients) does not take into account differences between patients that may predispose some individuals to respond positively to frequent follow-up visits, while others may respond negatively or not at all. Clinic visits comprise multiple components that may be therapeutic for depression, including activating patients' behavior, exposing them to medical procedures, permitting social interactions with research staff, and providing supportive meetings with clinicians. Two independent meta-analyses have associated more frequent study visits with increased antidepressant and placebo response as well as decreased separation between medication and placebo. Despite the high costs and potential disadvantages of weekly follow-up visits for patients receiving antidepressant medication, this clinical management strategy has not been studied prospectively to date. It is unknown whether weekly follow-up visits are needed to ensure treatment compliance and patient safety in clinical trials and to what degree contacts with clinicians influence medication and placebo response.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Inclusion Criteria Method of Ascertainment
- Men and women aged 18-75 years 1. Clinical interview
- Diagnosis with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) V Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) 2. Clinical interview, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V
- 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score ≥ 16 and ≤ 28; 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score 28 or HRSD suicide item > 2 or baseline HRSD 17-item score ≥ 25 4. HRSD by trained rater
- History of allergic or adverse reaction to escitalopram, or non-response to adequate trial of escitalopram (at least 4 weeks at dose of 20mg) during the current episode 5. Clinical interview
- Current treatment with psychotherapy, antidepressants, antipsychotics, or mood stabilizers 6. Clinical interview
- CGI-Severity score of 6 or greater at baseline 7. CGI based on Clinical interview
- Acute, severe, or unstable medical illness 8. Clinical interview, Physical Exam, Screening Labs
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03812588). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.