N/A
Completed N=100
Effect of Introducer Length on the Rate of Radial Artery Occlusion During Endovascular Coronary Procedures
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03854253 ↗Enrolled (actual)
100
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Participants With Radial Artery Occlusion — 4; 2 Participants
Summary
This study evaluates estimate impact of introducers length during endovascular coronary procedures on rate of a radial artery occlusion. For half of participants will use short introducers, while for other will use long introducers during transradial coronary intervention.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Number of Participants With Radial Artery Occlusion |
4; 2 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With a Hematoma, Stage I |
8; 8 | — |
| SECONDARY Rate of Conversion of Needle Type |
5; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Time of the Introducer Insertion |
94; 42.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Time of the Procedure |
448; 350.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Fluoroscopy Time |
82.0; 69.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Total Air Kerma |
140.8; 128.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With a Perforation / Dissection of a Radial Artery. |
0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Median Nerve Neuritis |
0; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With a Bleeding of the Puncture Site. |
1; 0 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Age over 18 years old
- Applicability of transradial approach
Exclusion Criteria
- Failure of the transradial approach
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03854253). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.