Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=100 Randomized Prevention

Effect of Introducer Length on the Rate of Radial Artery Occlusion During Endovascular Coronary Procedures

Coronary Artery Disease

Enrolled (actual)
100
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Radial Artery Occlusion — 4; 2 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Long introducer sheath (Procedure); Short introducer sheath (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Primary completion
Mar 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Radial Artery Occlusion
4; 2
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Hematoma, Stage I
8; 8
SECONDARY
Rate of Conversion of Needle Type
5; 0
SECONDARY
Time of the Introducer Insertion
94; 42.5
SECONDARY
Time of the Procedure
448; 350.5
SECONDARY
Fluoroscopy Time
82.0; 69.5
SECONDARY
Total Air Kerma
140.8; 128.2
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Perforation / Dissection of a Radial Artery.
0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Median Nerve Neuritis
0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Bleeding of the Puncture Site.
1; 0

Summary

This study evaluates estimate impact of introducers length during endovascular coronary procedures on rate of a radial artery occlusion. For half of participants will use short introducers, while for other will use long introducers during transradial coronary intervention.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age over 18 years old
  • Applicability of transradial approach

Exclusion Criteria

  • Failure of the transradial approach
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03854253). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search