Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=174

Chart Review of XEN 45 Gel Stent: Long Term Performance and Safety Assessment (XEN LT)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03868254 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
174
Serious AEs
1.2%
Results posted
Nov 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) to 36 Months After Implantation — 21.03; 20.21; -6.42; -6.73 mm Hg — p=<.0001

Summary

A retrospective, non-interventional, observational, multi-center, chart review study to be conducted in participants who underwent placement of the XEN 45 Gel Stent as a standalone procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification from 1 January 2014 to 1 October 2015.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) to 36 Months After Implantation
21.03; 20.21; -6.42; -6.73 <.0001 sig
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in the Number of Topical IOP-lowering Medications 36 Months After Implantation
2.6; 2.4; -1.6; -1.2 <.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Mean IOP to 48 Months After Implantation
21.03; 20.21; -5.46; -5.27 0.0030 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Number of Topical IOP-lowering Medications 48 Months After Implantation
2.6; 2.4; -1.1; -0.8 0.0053 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Eyes Achieving Qualified Success at Month 36
23.9; 40.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Eyes Achieving Qualified Success at Month 48
25.0; 33.3
SECONDARY
Percentage of Eyes Achieving Complete Success at Month 36
45.7; 20.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Eyes Achieving Complete Success at Month 48
33.3; 20.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Eyes With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
18.1; 10.4

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Eye treated with XEN 45 Gel Stent for primary open angle glaucoma as a standalone procedure or in combination with phacoemulsification
  • XEN 45 Gel Stent was implanted between 1 January 2014 and 1 October 2015

Exclusion Criteria

  • None
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03868254). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search