Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=352 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

SELECT2: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Optimize Patient's Selection for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03876457 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
352
Serious AEs
71.6%
Results posted
Mar 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Degree of Disability/Dependence as Measured by the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score — 4; 5 scores on a scale

Summary

SELECT 2 evaluates the efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy compared to medical management alone in acute ischemic stroke patients due to a large vessel occlusion in the distal ICA and MCA M1 who have large core on either CT (ASPECTS: 3-5) or advanced perfusion imaging ([rCBF<30%] on CTP or [ADC<620] on MRI: ≥50cc) or both and are treated within 0-24 hours from last known well.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Degree of Disability/Dependence as Measured by the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score
4; 5 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants That Achieved Functional Independence as Measured by a mRS Score of 0-2 at 90-day Follow-up
36; 12 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants That Achieved Independent Ambulation as Measured by a mRS Score of 0-3 at 90-day Follow-up
67; 32 —
SECONDARY
Number of Patients That Suffered a Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (sICH) as Measured by the SITS-MOST Criteria
1; 2 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Neurological Worsening Defined as a ≥4-point Increase on the NIHSS Score Due to the Stroke Itself
44; 27 —
SECONDARY
Number of Mortalities Within 90-day Follow-up
68; 71 —
SECONDARY
Number of Procedural Complications
30 —
SECONDARY
Successful Reperfusion in the EVT Group, Defined as Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) Grade of 2b or Higher
142 —
SECONDARY
Discharge Location
19; 10; 11; 16; 72; 65 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants That Showed Early Neurological Improvement, Defined as Improvement of ≥8 Points on NIHSS at 24 Hours of Presentation or an NIHSS of 0-1
20; 13 —
SECONDARY
Quality of Life Score, as Measured Using NeuroQOL at 90-day Follow-up
35.2; 25.1; 47.9; 53.6; 37.1; 33.5 —
SECONDARY
The 1-year Functional Outcome, as Measured by the Modified Rankin Scale Score
5; 6 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Functional Independence, Defined as mRS Score of 0-2 at 1-year Follow-up
40; 9 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Independent Ambulation, Defined as mRS Score of 0-3 at 1-year Follow-up
63; 29 —
SECONDARY
Quality of Life Score, as Measured Using NeuroQOL at 1 Year Follow-up
40.8; 27.2; 45.3; 52.1; 40.6; 35 —

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults (18-85 years) with the final diagnosis of an acute ischemic stroke
  • NIH Stroke Scale Score (NIHSS) ≥ 6
  • Last known well to groin puncture or medical management between 0 to 24 hours
  • Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) of 0-1
  • Eligible for thrombectomy or medical management
  • Signed Informed Consent obtained
  • Subject willing to comply with the protocol follow-up requirements
  • Anticipated life expectancy of at least 3 months

Specific Neuroimaging Inclusion Criteria:

  • Proven large vessel occlusion in ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion (carotid occlusions can be cervical or intracranial, with or without tandem MCA lesions) determined by MRA or CTA
  • Large infarct-core lesion on at least one of the following:
  • 2.1. Non-Contrast CT (ASPECTS of 3-5),
  • 2.2. CT perfusion (rCBF 80,
  • 2) current anticoagulant use,
  • 3) history of diabetes AND prior stroke,
  • 4) NIHSS >25,
  • 5) ischemic involvement of > 1/3 MCA territory
  • Current participation in another investigational drug or device study.

Neuroimaging Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who have both ASPECTS of 6-10 on non-contrast CT AND core volume <50 cc on perfusion imaging
  • Patients with very large core on non-contrast CT i.e. ASPECTS ≤ 2
  • Evidence of intracranial tumor (except small meningioma), acute intracranial hemorrhage, neoplasm, or arteriovenous malformation
  • A significant mass effect with midline shift
  • Evidence of internal carotid artery dissection that is flow limiting or aortic dissection
  • Intracranial stent implanted in the same vascular territory that precludes the safe deployment/removal of the neurothrombectomy device
  • Acute symptomatic arterial occlusions in more than one vascular territory confirmed on CTA/MRA (e.g., bilateral MCA occlusions, or an MCA and a basilar artery occlusion).
  • Signs of established infarct and large area of cerebral edema on non-contrast CT
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03876457). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search