N/A
Completed N=84
Comparison of Kinesio Taping and Local Injection in Chronic Low Back Pain
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03895307 ↗Enrolled (actual)
84
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Jul 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale — 7.26; 7.75; 7.8; 7.62 score on a scale
Summary
Low back pain can be seen in every period of life. More than 80 percent of the society complain of low back pain at any time of life. Although the frequency of applying to a health institution due to low back pain varies from one society to the other, it takes place in the first three places in each community. Low back pain should be differentiated as new (acute) and long-term (chronic). In the treatment of chronic low back pain, rest, education, pharmacological treatment, physical therapy, painful point injections, surgical interventions, kinesio taping can be applied. The most frequently used physical therapy modalities for treatment of chronic low back pain are superficial and deep heat modalities (hot pack, infrared, ultrasound, microwave diathermy radar) and analgesic effective electrotherapy (TENS, interferential flows) modalities. One of the most important treatments is exercise therapy. In cases where conventional treatment of chronic low back pain is insufficient, that is, the patient's pain is still ongoing and functional recovery is insufficient, some alternative methods are also applied. These treatments include ozone, prolotherapy injection applications, dry needling, acupuncture, phytotherapy, balneotherapy, kinesio taping and so on. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of painful point injection and kinesio taping treatments in lumbar region in patients with chronic low back pain.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale |
4.42; 5.20; 5; 6.48 | — |
| SECONDARY Disability Severity: Oswestry Disabiliy Index |
17.42; 18.30; 17.1; 17.57 | — |
| SECONDARY Disability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index |
13.84; 14.20; 13.35; 16.10 | — |
| SECONDARY Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning |
58.84; 55.15; 56.65; 54.05 | — |
| SECONDARY Spinal Mobility: Schober Test |
4.36; 4.42; 4.2; 4.54 | — |
| SECONDARY Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health |
74.42; 72.1; 73.60; 71.33 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Under 18 years of age under 75 years
- Chronic mechanic (decreased with resting and resting) for at least 3 months
- Visual Analogue Scale score of at least 60-
Exclusion Criteria
- Having mental problems
- Having the disease affecting the peripheral and central nervous system
- Have received physical therapy in the lumbar region within the last 3 months
- Injection into the lumbar region within the last 3 months
- Having a history of waist region surgery
- Low motor dysfunction in lower extremity in physical examination
- Needle phobia
- Is allergic to lidocaine
- Kinesio tape allergy
- Wound, infection, burn, allergic lesions in the application area
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03895307). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.