Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=84 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Comparison of Kinesio Taping and Local Injection in Chronic Low Back Pain

Chronic Low Back Pain

Enrolled (actual)
84
Serious AEs
Results posted
Jul 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale — 7.26; 7.75; 7.8; 7.62 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
kinesio tape (Other); local anesthetic (Other); local serum physiologic (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Sultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Primary completion
Jun 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale
4.42; 5.20; 5; 6.48
PRIMARY
Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale
4.42; 5.20; 5; 6.48
PRIMARY
Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale
4.42; 5.20; 5; 6.48
PRIMARY
Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale
4.42; 5.20; 5; 6.48
SECONDARY
Disability Severity: Oswestry Disabiliy Index
17.42; 18.30; 17.1; 17.57
SECONDARY
Disability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index
13.84; 14.20; 13.35; 16.10
SECONDARY
Disability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index
13.84; 14.20; 13.35; 16.10
SECONDARY
Disability Severity: Oswestry Disability Index
13.84; 14.20; 13.35; 16.10
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning
58.84; 55.15; 56.65; 54.05
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning
58.84; 55.15; 56.65; 54.05
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning
58.84; 55.15; 56.65; 54.05
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form 36 Physical Functioning
58.84; 55.15; 56.65; 54.05
SECONDARY
Spinal Mobility: Schober Test
4.36; 4.42; 4.2; 4.54
SECONDARY
Spinal Mobility: Schober Test
4.36; 4.42; 4.2; 4.54
SECONDARY
Spinal Mobility: Schober Test
4.36; 4.42; 4.2; 4.54
SECONDARY
Spinal Mobility: Schober Test
4.36; 4.42; 4.2; 4.54
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health
74.42; 72.1; 73.60; 71.33
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health
74.42; 72.1; 73.60; 71.33
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health
74.42; 72.1; 73.60; 71.33
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Quality of Life: Short Form-36 Mental Health
74.42; 72.1; 73.60; 71.33

Summary

Low back pain can be seen in every period of life. More than 80 percent of the society complain of low back pain at any time of life. Although the frequency of applying to a health institution due to low back pain varies from one society to the other, it takes place in the first three places in each community. Low back pain should be differentiated as new (acute) and long-term (chronic). In the treatment of chronic low back pain, rest, education, pharmacological treatment, physical therapy, painful point injections, surgical interventions, kinesio taping can be applied. The most frequently used physical therapy modalities for treatment of chronic low back pain are superficial and deep heat modalities (hot pack, infrared, ultrasound, microwave diathermy radar) and analgesic effective electrotherapy (TENS, interferential flows) modalities. One of the most important treatments is exercise therapy. In cases where conventional treatment of chronic low back pain is insufficient, that is, the patient's pain is still ongoing and functional recovery is insufficient, some alternative methods are also applied. These treatments include ozone, prolotherapy injection applications, dry needling, acupuncture, phytotherapy, balneotherapy, kinesio taping and so on. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of painful point injection and kinesio taping treatments in lumbar region in patients with chronic low back pain.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Under 18 years of age under 75 years
  • Chronic mechanic (decreased with resting and resting) for at least 3 months
  • Visual Analogue Scale score of at least 60-

Exclusion Criteria

  • Having mental problems
  • Having the disease affecting the peripheral and central nervous system
  • Have received physical therapy in the lumbar region within the last 3 months
  • Injection into the lumbar region within the last 3 months
  • Having a history of waist region surgery
  • Low motor dysfunction in lower extremity in physical examination
  • Needle phobia
  • Is allergic to lidocaine
  • Kinesio tape allergy
  • Wound, infection, burn, allergic lesions in the application area
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03895307). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search