Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=10 Diagnostic

Study Comparing the P200TE and the P200TxE in Glaucoma Patients

Glaucoma

Enrolled (actual)
10
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Qualitative B-Scan Assessment — 2.78; 2.77; 2.08 Mean score on a scale (0-3)

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
P200TE (Device); P200TxE (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 22+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Optos, PLC
Primary completion
Apr 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Qualitative B-Scan Assessment
2.78; 2.77; 2.08
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
0; 0

Summary

The study evaluates the image quality between two OCT devices.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male or female subjects 22 years of age or older who have full legal capacity to volunteer on the date the informed consent is signed;
  • Subjects who can follow the instructions by the clinical staff at the clinical site,
  • Subjects who agree to participate in the study;
  • Subjects who have been diagnosed with glaucoma in the study eye as confirmed by the investigator;

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects unable to tolerate ophthalmic imaging;
  • Subjects with ocular media not sufficiently clear to obtain acceptable OCT images;
  • Subjects with any clinically significant ocular pathology except glaucoma, as determined by self-report and/or investigator assessment on the day of the study visit;
  • Subjects who are not reliably tested with at least one Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) visual field (24-2 or 30-2, white on white) measured on the day of the study visit or within the previous year from the study visit, defined as fixation losses > 20% or false positives > 33%, or false negatives > 33%;
  • Subjects with history of dementia or multiple sclerosis
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03912584). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search