Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=27 Randomized Single-blind Prevention

Evaluation of an Enhanced Delivery Model for Go NAPSACC

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03938103 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
27
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Mean Nutrition Environment Score — 1.88; 1.98; 2.06; 2.08 score on a scale — p=0.101

Summary

This study will compare the effectiveness and cost of Basic and Enhanced delivery models for Go NAPSACC on child care centers' use of evidence-based nutrition and physical activity practices. Technical assistance (TA) coaches from Child Care Aware of Kentucky will lead delivery. Half of the TA coaches will deliver Go NAPSACC using the Basic model and the other half will deliver the program using the Enhanced model. It is hypothesized that the Enhanced model will result in greater use of evidence-based nutrition and physical activity practices and will also be more cost effective.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Nutrition Environment Score
1.88; 1.98; 2.06; 2.08 0.101
PRIMARY
Mean Physical Activity Environment Score
1.26; 1.33; 1.50; 1.50 0.383
SECONDARY
Number of Centers That Created a Go NAPSACC Website Account
40; 38
SECONDARY
Go NAPSACC Core Program Components Completed by Centers
27; 22; 13; 7; 2; 0
SECONDARY
Percent of Nutrition Best Practices Met Computed From Self-assessments Completed on Go NAPSACC Website
49.4; 47.6; 63.2; 52.4
SECONDARY
Percent of Physical Activity Best Practices Met Computed From Self-assessments Completed on Go NAPSACC Website
31.8; 34.4; 60.0; 28.3
SECONDARY
Contextual Setting (Director Report) - Impact of Center Culture, Implementation Climate, Leadership Engagement, Available Resources, and Information Access at Baseline on Intervention Effects
32.31; 36.94; 40.07; 41.47; 30.17; 30.11
SECONDARY
Contextual Setting (Staff Report) - Impact of Center Culture, Implementation Climate, Leadership Engagement, Available Resources, and Information Access at Baseline on Intervention Effects
31.74; 34.13; 37.56; 39.63; 30.75; 34.15
SECONDARY
Cost of Implementation for Enhanced and Basic Models
154.77; 94.10
SECONDARY
Go NAPSACC Core Program Components: Percent of a TA Coaches Centers Completing Implementation Components
71.4; 85.6; 75.6; 76.9; 19.1; 12.2
SECONDARY
Go NAPSACC Core Program Components: TA Coach Held Cross-Center Meetings
49.6
SECONDARY
Go NAPSACC Core Program Components: TA Coach Complete Logs
57.1; 92.3
SECONDARY
Go NAPSACC Core Program Components: TA Coach Training Attendance
83.3; 96.2
SECONDARY
Go NAPSACC Core Program Components: TA Coach Attended Check-ins With Study Team
83.6; 96.2

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

TA Coaches

  • Must either be a Quality coach or a Health and Safety coach
  • Must be able to read and speak English

Child Care Centers

  • Must be a part of a participating TA coach's current caseload
  • Have no plans to close in the coming year
  • Serve at least lunch to the children
  • Not serve special needs children exclusively

Child Care Providers

  • Teacher must be the lead teacher in a preschool classroom
  • Center directors and teachers must be able to read and speak English

Exclusion Criteria

Child Care Centers

  • Serve special needs children exclusively
  • Serve only non-English speaking families
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03938103). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search