Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=4 Supportive Care

RESCU System for Robust Upper Limb Prosthesis Control

Amputation · Upper Limb

Enrolled (actual)
4
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Daily Prosthesis Use Duration — 3.81; 6.83 hours

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
RESCU (Device); Pattern Recognition (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Infinite Biomedical Technologies
Primary completion
Dec 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Daily Prosthesis Use Duration
3.81; 6.83
SECONDARY
Activities Measure for Upper Limb Amputees (AM-ULA)
SECONDARY
Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey Upper Extremity Functional Status (OPUS UEFS)
SECONDARY
Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Survey for Upper Limb Amputation (TAPES-ULA)
SECONDARY
PROMIS Satisfaction Short Form 8a
SECONDARY
Pain Scale
SECONDARY
Socket Comfort Score
SECONDARY
Range of Motion (of Residual Joints)

Summary

This study will compare the use of RESCU [Experimental] Prosthesis with a [Standard] pattern recognition prosthesis in a clinical setting and in unsupervised daily activity. The protocol will follow a single case experimental design (SCED) to compensate for the limited size of the patient population. Each of the participants will use the Standard and Experimental and systems over a 35-day period. The Standard system will include at least two controllable DoFs (hand, wrist, multi-articulated hand, etc) and a commercially-available pattern recognition controller. The RESCU system will use the same components as the Standard system but will differ with respect to incorporating eight IBT Element Electrodes (as required for pattern recognition control) and the RESCU control software. The hypothesis is that pattern recognition will outperform the commercially-available control strategy for most participants on in-clinic, at-home usage, and subjective measures.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Trans-radial limb difference.
  • Candidate for a 2+ degree-of-freedom (DoF) myoelectric pattern recognition prosthesis as determined by the study prosthetist
  • Active pattern recognition myoelectric prosthesis user
  • Fluent in English
  • Age of 18 years or greater

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with a residual limb that is unhealed from the amputation surgery
  • Patients with easily damaged or sensitive skin who would not tolerate EMG electrodes
  • Unhealed wounds
  • Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Uncontrolled pain or phantom pain impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Serious uncontrolled medical problems as judged by the project therapist
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04043234). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search