Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=397 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab vs. Aflibercept in Chinese Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04047472 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
397
Serious AEs
11.8%
Results posted
Dec 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity in Study Eye — 9.9; 10.9 Letters Read — p=0.006
◆ Published Evidence
No publication linked

No peer-reviewed publication reporting this trial's results has been linked yet. This can indicate results are unpublished — a known publication-bias signal. We re-check periodically.

Summary

To compare brolucizumab to aflibercept in Chinese patients with untreated active choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD)

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline at Week 48 in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity in Study Eye
9.9; 10.9 0.006 sig
SECONDARY
Average Change From Baseline Over the Period of Week 36 to Week 48 in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity in Study Eye
9.7; 11.0 0.009 sig
SECONDARY
q12w Treatment Status at Week 48 (for Subjects Randomized to Brolucizumab 6 mg Only) - Probability
0.595 —
SECONDARY
q12w Treatment Status at Week 48 Within the Subjects With no q8w Need During the First q12w Cycle (Week 16 and Week 20) (for Subjects Randomized to Brolucizumab 6 mg Only) - Probability
0.860 —
SECONDARY
Number (%) of Participants With q8w Treatment Need as Assessed by the Investigator at First Disease Activity Assessment (DAA) Visit
30; 47 —
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Each Study Visit in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity in Study Eye
3.9; 4.2; 6.1; 6.5; 7.4; 8.4 —
SECONDARY
Average Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (Letters Read) From Week 4 or Week 12 up to Week 48 for the Study Eye
8.3; 9.6; 8.9; 10.4 —
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With Best-Corrected Visual Acuity of 73 Letters or More at Each Visit
36; 50; 47; 60; 59; 70 —
SECONDARY
Gain in BCVA (Letters Read): Number (%) of Participants Who Gained ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters in Best-correct Visual Acuity From Baseline or Reached BCVA ≥ 84 Letters at Week 48 for the Study Eye
139; 146; 103; 104; 68; 73 —
SECONDARY
Gain in BCVA (Letters Read): Number (%) of Participants Who Gained ≥ 5 Letters in Best-correct Visual Acuity From Baseline or Reached BCVA >=84 Letters at the Post-baseline Visit for the Study Eye
73; 94; 102; 115; 122; 139 —
SECONDARY
Gain in BCVA (Letters Read): Number (%) of Participants Who Gained ≥ 10 Letters in Best-correct Visual Acuity From Baseline or Reached BCVA >=84 Letters at the Post-baseline Visit for the Study Eye
39; 35; 57; 59; 79; 85 —
SECONDARY
Gain in BCVA (Letters Read): Number (%) of Participants Who Gained ≥ 15 Letters in Best-correct Visual Acuity From Baseline or Reached BCVA >=84 Letters at the Post-baseline Visit for the Study Eye
21; 19; 37; 28; 49; 48 —
SECONDARY
Loss in BCVA (Letters Read): Number (%) of Participants Who Lost ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters in Best-correct Visual Acuity From Baseline at Week 48 for the Study Eye
16; 11; 7; 6; 5; 4 —
SECONDARY
Loss in BCVA (Letters Read): Number (%) of Participants Who Lost ≥ 5 Letters in Best-correct Visual Acuity From Baseline to Each Post-baseline Visit for the Study
20; 15; 19; 15; 14; 8 —
SECONDARY
Loss in BCVA (Letters Read): Number (%) of Participants Who Lost ≥ 10 Letters in Best-correct Visual Acuity From Baseline to Each Post-baseline Visit for the Study
6; 6; 5; 4; 6; 4 —
SECONDARY
Loss in BCVA (Letters Read): Number (%) of Participants Who Lost ≥ 15 Letters in Best-correct Visual Acuity From Baseline to Each Post-baseline Visit for the Study
2; 5; 2; 3; 5; 3 —
SECONDARY
Average Change From Baseline Over the Period Week 4 Through Week 48 in Central Subfield Thickness - Total in Study Eye
-181.2; -161.9 —
SECONDARY
Average Change From Baseline Over the Period Week 36 Through 48 in Central Subfield Thickness - Total in Study Eye
-187.9; -167.2 —
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Each Study Visit in Central Subfield Thickness - Total in Study Eye
-148.5; -132.5; -183.3; -161.8; -193.2; -169.9 —
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Each Study Visit in Central Subfield Thickness - Neurosensory Retina (μm) in Study Eye
-57.2; -48.3; -65.4; -53.2; -68.6; -53.2 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Presence of Subretinal Field (SRF) and/or Intraretinal Fluid (Central Subfield) (IRF) in the Study Eye at Each Postbaseline Visit (and Specifically Week 16 and Week 48)
78; 92; 32; 51; 33; 44 —
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Absence of Subretinal Field (SRF) and Intraretinal Fluid (Central Subfield) (IRF) in the Study Eye Between Week 36 and Week 48
18; 24; 13; 12; 15; 18 —
SECONDARY
Subretinal Fluid (SRF) Status in the Central Subfield: Number of Subjects With Presence of SRF by Visit for the Study Eye
149; 156; 63; 83; 19; 42 —
SECONDARY
Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) Status in the Central Subfield: Number of Subjects With Presence of IRF by Visit for the Study Eye
83; 81; 26; 17; 15; 13 —
SECONDARY
Subretinal Pigment Epithelium (Sub-RPE) Fluid Status in the Central Subfield: Number of Subjects With Presence of Sub-RPE by Visit for the Study Eye
26; 32; 11; 20; 7; 17 —
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Weeks 12 and 48 in Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) Lesion in Study Eye
-1.395; -1.378; -2.034; -1.984 —
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With Presence of Fibrosis (Central Subfield) in the Study Eye by Visit
0; 0; 15; 17; 18; 24 —
SECONDARY
Change in Subject Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Composite Score
3.0; 3.7; 4.1; 2.9 —
SECONDARY
Change in Subject Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - General Vision
7.7; 7.8; 9.0; 6.4 —
SECONDARY
Change in Subject Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Ocular Pain
0.9; 6.1; 1.0; 3.1 —
SECONDARY
Change in Subject Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Near Activities
5.3; 5.8; 8.1; 5.7 —
SECONDARY
Change in Subject Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Distance Activities
2.2; 4.2; 3.8; 4.8 —
SECONDARY
Change in Subject Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Social Functioning
1.5; 2.4; 2.3; 0.8 —
SECONDARY
Change in Subject Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Mental Health
4.6; 0.6; 4.7; 1.0 —
SECONDARY
Change in Subject Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Role Difficulties
0.5; 3.8; 4.5; 2.7 —
SECONDARY
Change in Subject Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Dependency
3.9; 2.1; 6.6; 0.6 —
SECONDARY
Change in Subject Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Driving
3.4; 0.8; 3.9; 4.6 —
SECONDARY
Change in Subject Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Color Vision
1.3; 2.2; 0.6; 0.5 —
SECONDARY
Change in Subject Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Peripheral Vision
1.6; 2.4; 0.5; 1.4 —
SECONDARY
Change in Subject Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - General Health Rating
-3.6; 0.7; -4.4; -2.7 —
SECONDARY
Anti-drug Antibody (ADA): Frequency Distribution of Pre-dose ADA Status in the Brolucizumab Arm
82; 116 —
SECONDARY
Anti-drug Antibody (ADA): Frequency Distribution of Integrated ADA Status in the Brolucizumab Arm
170; 27 —
SECONDARY
Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Cmax After First Brolucizumab 6 mg Dose in a Subset of Subjects
39.7 —
SECONDARY
Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Tmax After First Brolucizumab 6 mg Dose in a Subset of Subjects
5.25 —
SECONDARY
Pharmacokinetic Parameters: AUClast After First Brolucizumab 6 mg Dose in a Subset of Subjects
2690 —
SECONDARY
Pharmacokinetic Parameters: AUCinf After First Brolucizumab 6 mg Dose in a Subset of Subjects
3100 —
SECONDARY
Pharmacokinetic Parameters: T1/2 After First Brolucizumab 6 mg Dose in a Subset of Subjects
110 —
SECONDARY
Pharmacokinetic Parameters: CL/F After First Brolucizumab 6 mg Dose in a Subset of Subjects
1.93 —
SECONDARY
Pharmacokinetic Parameters: Vz/F After First Brolucizumab 6 mg Dose in a Subset of Subjects
307 —
SECONDARY
Most Common Ocular Adverse Events (Greater Than or Equal to 2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye
58; 48; 10; 6; 7; 3 —
SECONDARY
Non-ocular Adverse Events (Greater Than or Equal to 2% in Any Treatment Arm)
97; 113 —

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment was performed.
  • Male or female Chinese participants ≥ 50 years of age at the time of screening.
  • Active CNV lesions secondary to AMD that affect the central subfield (including retinal angiomatous proliferation lesions with a CNV component) in the study eye at screening and confirmed by the Central Reading Center (CRC).
  • Total area of CNV (including both classic and occult components) must comprise > 50% of the total lesion area in the study eye at screening and confirmed by the CRC.
  • Intra and/or subretinal fluid affecting the central subfield of the study eye at screening and confirmed by the CRC.
  • BCVA between 78 and 23 letters, inclusive, in the study eye at screening and baseline using ETDRS testing.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Any active intraocular or periocular infection or active intraocular inflammation (e.g., infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, endophthalmitis, infectious blepharitis, uveitis) in study eye at baseline.
  • Central subfield of the study eye affected by fibrosis or geographic atrophy assessed by color fundus photography at screening and confirmed by the CRC.
  • Total area of fibrosis ≥ 50% of the total lesion in the study eye at screening and confirmed by the CRC.
  • Subretinal blood affecting the foveal center point and/or ≥ 50% of the lesion of the study eye at screening and confirmed by the CRC.
  • Previous treatment with any approved or investigational drugs for nAMD in the study eye (other than vitamin supplements).
  • Retinal pigment epithelium rip/tear in the study eye at screening.
  • Current vitreous hemorrhage or history of vitreous hemorrhage in the study eye within 4 weeks prior to baseline.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04047472). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search