Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=263 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

To Compare Brolucizumab to Aflibercept in Chinese Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic Macular Edema

Enrolled (actual)
263
Serious AEs
19.0%
Results posted
Sep 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) for the Study Eye. — 10.6; 11.9 Scores on a scale — p=0.013

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Brolucizumab (Drug); Aflibercept (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Primary completion
Jan 2023

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) for the Study Eye.
10.6; 11.9 0.013 sig
PRIMARY
Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) - Average Change From Baseline Over the Period Week 40 Through Week 52 for the Study Eye
10.1; 12.0 0.035 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline by Visit up to Week 52 in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) for the Study Eye
5.1; 4.4; 7.2; 6.6; 8.6; 8.0
SECONDARY
Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) - Average Change From Baseline Over the Period Week 4 Through Week 52 for the Study Eye
9.0; 10.1
SECONDARY
Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) - Average Change From Baseline Over the Period Week 20 Through Week 52 for the Study Eye
9.6; 11.5
SECONDARY
Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) - Average Change From Baseline Over the Period Week 28 Through Week 52 for the Study Eye
9.6; 11.7
SECONDARY
Time-to-first q8w Treatment Need: Summary for Brolucizumab Subjects by Disease Activity Assessment Visit
1; 0.733; 0.447; 0.417
SECONDARY
Time-to-first q8w Treatment Need: Summary for Brolucizumab Subjects by Disease Activity Assessment Visit, Within Those Subjects With no q8w-need During the Initial q12w Cycle
1; 0.931
SECONDARY
Number and Percentage of Patients Who Gained in ≥5, ≥10 and ≥15 ETDRS Letters in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52 for the Study Eye
102; 104; 74; 76; 44; 48
SECONDARY
Time to Achieve Gain of >= 5 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Reach BCVA >=84 Letters for the Study Eye - Probability of BCVA Gain
0.136; 0.038; 0.508; 0.420; 0.720; 0.634
SECONDARY
Time to Achieve Gain of >= 10 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Reach BCVA >=84 Letters for the Study Eye - Probability of BCVA Gain
0.061; 0.000; 0.227; 0.198; 0.394; 0.306
SECONDARY
Time to Achieve Gain of >= 15 Letters in BCVA From Baseline or Reach BCVA >=84 Letters for the Study Eye - Probability of BCVA Gain
0.008; 0.000; 0.083; 0.069; 0.152; 0.161
SECONDARY
Number and Percentage of Patients Who Lost ≥5, ≥10 and ≥15 ETDRS Letters in BCVA From Baseline to Week 52 for the Study Eye
4; 4; 2; 1; 1; 1
SECONDARY
Proportion of Patients Who Have Absolute BCVA ≥73 ETDRS Letters at Each Post-baseline Visit for the Study Eye
32; 34; 36; 46; 46; 55
SECONDARY
Number (%) of Subjects With q8w Treatment Need as Assessed by the Investigator at First Disease Activity Assessment (DAA) Visit - Week 32
34; 38
SECONDARY
Number (%) of Subjects With q8w Treatment Need as Assessed by the Investigator at Week 36, and Week 48
50; 32; 25; 32
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) for the Study Eye
-225.2; -215.0
SECONDARY
Average Change From Baseline Over the Period Week 40 Through Week 52 in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) for the Study Eye
-215.1; -212.7
SECONDARY
Average Change From Baseline Over the Period Week 4 Through Week 52 in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) for the Study Eye
-207.7; -199.2
SECONDARY
Number and Percentage of Patients Who Have CSFT (<280 Microns) at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye
24; 17; 36; 22; 48; 29
SECONDARY
Number (%) of Patients With Progression to Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) as Assessed by ETDRS DRSS of at Least 61 by Week 52 for the Study Eye Among the Subset of Non-PDR Subjects at Screening
1; 0
SECONDARY
Number (%) of Patients With Presence of Leakage in the Study Eye on Fluorescein Angiography (FA)
110; 115
SECONDARY
Number (%) of Patients With Presence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF), Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) in the Study Eye
87; 85
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Presence of Subretinal Fluid (SRF) in the Study at Each Assessment Visit
33; 37; 17; 28; 13; 20
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Presence of Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) in the Study at Each Assessment Visit
113; 115; 112; 110; 109; 112
SECONDARY
Intraretinal Fluid (IRF) Status in the Central Subfield: Proportion of Subjects With Presence of IRF in the Study Eye by Visit
117; 118; 113; 114; 111; 114
SECONDARY
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number of Subjects With >=2-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye - Number of Subjects
45; 47; 62; 64
SECONDARY
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=2-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye - Percentage Estimates
33.9; 36.3; 46.7; 49.5
SECONDARY
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number of Subjects With >=3-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye - Number of Subjects
21; 15; 25; 25
SECONDARY
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=3-step Improvement From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye - Percentage Estimates
15.8; 11.6; 18.8; 19.3
SECONDARY
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number of Subjects With >=2-step Worsening From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye - Number of Subjects
1; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=2-step Worsening From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye - Percentage Estimates
0.8; 0.0
SECONDARY
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Number of Subjects With >=3-step Worsening From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye - Number of Subjects
1; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS): Proportion of Subjects With >=3-step Worsening From Baseline in the DRSS Score at Each Assessment Visit for the Study Eye - Percentage Estimates
0.8; 0.0
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Overall Score
5.3; 7.7; 5.4; 6.6
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - General Vision
10.4; 9.5; 10.9; 11.5
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Ocular Pain
5.1; 5.3; 3.5; 2.6
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Near Activities
8.5; 9.7; 7.8; 8.0
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Distance Activities
5.6; 7.6; 4.2; 6.5
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Social Functioning
3.8; 5.2; 3.7; 5.8
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Mental Health
7.2; 8.4; 7.4; 6.7
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Dependency
3.3; 9.2; 5.2; 5.7
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Driving
-3.4; 9.8; 0.1; 6.0
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Color Vision
2.4; 3.0; 4.2; 3.3
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - Peripheral Vision
3.9; 7.5; 3.5; 7.7
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline at Week 28 and Week 52 in Patient Reported Outcomes (Visual Function Questionnaire-25) - General Health Rating
3.1; 2.2; 4.2; -0.2
SECONDARY
Brolucizumab Serum Concentration
21.1; 13.4
SECONDARY
Number (%) of Patients Who Have Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Status in Brolucizumab Arm
35; 73; 16; 7
SECONDARY
Ocular Adverse Events (AEs) (>=2% in Any Treatment Arm) by Preferred Term for the Study Eye
57; 47; 12; 6; 8; 9
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects With Non-ocular Adverse Events (AEs) (>=2% in Any Treatment Arm)
94; 74

Summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in treatment of Chinese patients with visual impairment due to Diabetic Macular Edema.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to participation in the study.
  • Patients ≥18 years of age at screening
  • Patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of ≤10% at screening
  • Medication for the management of diabetes must have been stable within 3 months prior to randomization and is expected to remain as stable as medically acceptable during the course of the study
  • Study Eye Visual impairment due to diabetic macular edema (DME) with:
  • Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score between 78 and 23 letters, inclusive, using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity (VA) testing charts at a starting testing distance of 4 meters (approximate Snellen equivalent of 20/32 to 20/320) at screening and baseline
  • DME involving the center of the macula, with central subfield retinal thickness (e.g. measured from retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) to the inner limiting membrane (ILM) inclusively) of ≥320 μm on Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at screening.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Active Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in the study eye as per investigator
  • Concomitant conditions or ocular disorders in the study eye at screening or baseline which could, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent response to study treatment or may confound interpretation of study results, compromise visual acuity or require medical or surgical intervention for the duration of the study (e.g. cataract, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal vascular occlusion, retinal detachment, macular hole, or choroidal neovascularization (CNV) of any cause)
  • Any active intraocular or periocular infection or active intraocular inflammation (e.g. infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, endophthalmitis, infectious blepharitis, uveitis) in study eye at screening or baseline
  • Structural damage of the fovea in the study eye at screening likely to preclude improvement in visual acuity following the resolution of macular edema (ME), including atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium, subretinal fibrosis, laser scar(s), epiretinal membrane involving fovea or organized hard exudate plaques
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) > 25 mmHg on medication or according to investigator's judgment at Screening or Baseline
  • Neovascularization of the iris in the study eye at screening or baseline
  • Evidence of vitreomacular traction in the study eye at screening or baseline which in the opinion of the investigator, affects visual acuity
  • Previous treatment with any anti-vascular growth factor (VEGF) drug or investigational drugs in the study eye
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04058067). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search