Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=106 Randomized Treatment

Thoracic Epidural Analgesia vs Surgical Site Infiltration With Liposomal Bupivacaine Following Open Gynecologic Surgery

Surgery · Analgesia

Enrolled (actual)
106
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2026
Primary outcome: Primary: Analgesia Assessed by the Area Under the Curve of Visual Analog Scale Pain Intensity Scores — 87.1; 92.8 VAS score x Hours

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Liposomal bupivacaine (Drug); Thoracic epidural analgesia (bupivacaine) (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Primary completion
Mar 2025

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Analgesia Assessed by the Area Under the Curve of Visual Analog Scale Pain Intensity Scores
87.1; 92.8
PRIMARY
Total Opioid Consumption
21.2; 18.8
SECONDARY
Patient-perceived Quality of Recovery as Assessed by the Quality of Recovery-15 Instrument (QoR-15)
106.24; 107.46
SECONDARY
Time (Days) to Return of Bowel Function (ROBF)
2; 3
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Postoperative Ileus
6; 6
SECONDARY
Mobility as Assessed by the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM) Scale
7.25; 7.27
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Sedation Score ≥2 as Assessed by the Pasero Opioid-Induced Sedation Scale
1; 3
SECONDARY
Length of Stay
4; 4.5
SECONDARY
Time to Postoperative Diuresis
48; 41.75
SECONDARY
Total Intravenous Fluids Administered in mL
2523; 2379
SECONDARY
Amount of Vasopressor Required
540; 890
SECONDARY
Duration of Vasopressor Administration
139.5; 219
SECONDARY
Number Participants With Postoperative Complications
1; 0; 1; 5; 1; 3
SECONDARY
Total Direct Cost of TEA Placement and LB Surgical Site Infiltration
1168.6; 670.5
SECONDARY
Post-discharge Narcotic Utilization
22.5; 7.5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With 30-day Hospital Readmission
3; 6

Summary

The goal of this study is to test the hypothesis that surgical site infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is non-inferior to and more cost effective than thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) for patients undergoing open gynecologic surgery on an established enhanced recovery program (ERP) using a non-inferiority randomized trial design. The impact of TEA and surgical site infiltration with LB on neuroendocrine and inflammatory mediators of surgical stress response (SSR) will also be investigated as a translational endpoint.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Individuals ≥ 18 years of age
  • Planned laparotomy by the gynecologic oncology service at the sponsor institution.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Individuals who have a contraindication to thoracic epidural analgesia
  • Individuals with a coagulation disorder
  • Individuals with an infection at the site of epidural placement
  • Individuals with intracranial pathology such as non-communicating increased intracranial pressure or obstruction of cerebrospinal fluid flow related to mass lesions
  • Individuals with spinal pathology: abnormal spine anatomy, surgical fusion, or spinal column lesions
  • Individuals who have a contraindication to liposomal bupivacaine
  • Individuals with a known allergic reaction to liposomal bupivacaine
  • Individuals with Childs-Pugh Class B or C liver disease
  • Individuals who have a history of long-term opioid use for chronic pain, defined as use of opioid pain medications for ≥4 weeks prior to surgery.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04117074). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search