Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=703

A Single-center, Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Clinical Performance of Artificial Intelligence Medical Assisted Diagnostic Software (VeriSee DR) for Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04160988 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
703
Serious AEs
Results posted
Jan 2021
Primary outcomePrimary: Sensitivity — 95 percent

Summary

This study is to evaluate the clinical performance of VeriSee DR for DR screening from color fundus photography images in patients with diabetes mellitus. The sensitivity and specificity of VeriSee DR's automated image analysis for screening the diabetes retinopathy will be determined.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Sensitivity
95
PRIMARY
Specificity
89.9
SECONDARY
Positive Predictive Values (PPV)
94.5
SECONDARY
Negative Predictive Values (NPV)
90.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participant Images With Insufficient Quality as Judged by VeriSee DR
28

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects enrolled in this study should meet all the following criteria.
  • Subject with age ≥ 20 years old
  • Subject with documented diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
  • Subject with image taken by color fundus photography that meet the following requirement:
  • The resolution of image is 1024×1024 pixels or higher;
  • The angle view of image is 45 or 50 degree.
  • Subject's image includes macula and optic nerve as judged by the ophthalmologist.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria.
  • The color fundus photography image previously used by VeriSee DR during the development process and pre-clinical test
  • The macula, optic nerve, or other part in the image of color fundus photography is unclear to determine the disease condition as judged by the ophthalmologist.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04160988). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search